25 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Oh my gosh, arJ, this is so weird—I was just preparing a reading of “Wild Things” By the way, Maurice Sendak has a new pop-up book out now or soon. (Also, something’s weird about the comment box in my browser (IE)—it doesn’t seem to have a right-hand margin.) |
Rosalynde, I hope I didn’t stomp on any toes (or claws.) Post a trackback when your post goes up, I’d love to see it. Sendak is also working on a Where the Wild Things Are movie. Maybe they can get Michael Balam to be a Wild Thing alongside Benecio del Torro. Also, I have no idea what to do about problems in IE. I suggest upgrading to the latest Firefox and never using IE again. I know that isn’t a very good solution. It might be that the formatting of this post (three columns and whatnot) has caused the problem. |
wow, So this post tells me this is gonna be the “Weird Mormon” Group. Cool. Like it already. |
you people are straight up crazy. Especially that Randomjohn. How is that zoom? |
You don’t have to look all that closely at the final image of Max to see that the authentic Max has been replaced by a pseudo-Max who has not appeared in the text before. The pseudo-Max is clearly the work of a later redactor or a copyist who did not understand the ritual context of the original. The historical Max of the Urtext is a figure of protomythical power who ascends from abjection to kingship, while pseudo-Max is a pathetically addled figure with a pot belly. I hear the original manuscript is kept under lock and key in the Vatican library. |
Close textual analysis will demonstrate that there isn’t a single Sendak, but rather a first, second and third Sendak. |
mw*, Hey! I resemble that comment! Once in college I overheard a conversation in which three Mormons in our dorm where being compared by one of the dorm residents. My roommate was listed as the quiet, conservative Mormon, the guy down the hall as the “typical Mormon” and I was the “crazy fun Mormon”. I took it as a compliment. In any case, please don’t judge the others here or the blog as whole by my post. They may or may not be weird. il_slinky, The zoom is “impressive”. Jonathan Green, I knew I was missing something. Not having the book in front of me probably hurt my analysis. Maybe we can get Robert Langdon to smuggle a copy out of the Vatican… |
John, this rocks. |
This is almost as good as that story I heard of a speaker using a reading of “Green Eggs and Ham” as an object lesson on abstinence before marriage (with all the inevitably disturbing imagery that would go with that…). |
Interesting!! I think it will make it even more fun to read almost every night to our 3 year old now that I can see it in a new light! |
Eric, Thanks for the compliment! Enjoy this one because the rest of what I post will be senseless drivel. Seth R., I’d like to know the details of the Green Eggs and Ham talk. It would seem to me that the moral of Green Eggs and Ham would be something along the lines of “try it, try it, here they are!” and that would include on a boat, with a goat, in the rain, on a train, in the dark, in a tree, in a car, with a fox, in a box, with a mouse, in a house, here or there, anywhere! I have a hard time understanding how anyone could construe it as advocating abstinence, but I am willing to be corrected. |
suz, The funny thing is that reading to our kids as an adult has shed new light on several kids books for me. I really couldn’t (or didn’t) appreciate them as a kid, which is part of the subject of another post that I’m thinking of. I suspect that our kids will have the same experience decades from now. That reminds me, we need to find a copy of No Fighting, No Biting. |
holy crap! Guess who illustrated No Fighting, No Biting? (The answer is left as an exercise for the reader. You’re already on the internet, so no whining…) I had not a clue. |
oh MY *HECK* You have brought new life to a book that I have long loved. That WAS *AMAZING* |
I agree with Suz, reading stories as an adult does bring new meaning. And you are weird…and maybe peculiar? But I think that’s a good thing… |
Awesome,arJ. |
Hmm, can we request books then for spiritual insight? We recently checked out “Shrek!” (it’s quite different than the movie). See if Paul likes it, then see if it inspires you? (Hey it’s got talking donkeys so there has to be something religious or biblical to it…) ps. I thought you were going to have threaded commenting…. |
I’ve tried in recent days to nudge DKL in the direction of threaded comments … maybe it’s too late. |
[...] 20. is King of the Wild Things, a random John (18) [...] |
[...] presence does not prove that the record is ancient: witness Green Eggs and Ham and Where the Wild Things Are. I don’t think I had any new insights on this [...] |
The interactions between Max and his mother parallel the interactions between the Wild Things and Max, indicating that Max is to the Wild Things as his mother is to him. What did u wanted to say with this? I really don’t understand. thanks |
Thank goodness for spam, bringing this post to my attention two years later. Awesome, ARJ. |
Awesome, awesome. Dont know why it came into my sight so late. I liked the story, and i like your thing more. |
I’m gratified that people still find this entertaining, even though #21 is clearly spam and #23 seems particularly spammy linkwise despite appropriate text. Looking back I could have gone into more detail. I should probably buy the follow up books and post on them as well. I’m still waiting for Rosalynde to do her own WtWTA post… |
WTWTA is such a great childrens’ book; I remember reading it in elementary school and I’ve just recently seen people wearing t-shirts with graphics from it. I’m not sure I’d read into the meanings of it as much as you, but in any case it’s a worthy analysis. As an artist and writer, I have to say that sometimes people place meanings on creative works because it makes them more interesting, when in fact the original creator simply came up with something that felt good and did not necessarily have any implied “deeper” connotations. |