8 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Thanks DKL – she was a great American. However, I take issue with the fact that the feminists don’t admire her. I know a lot of Mormon feminists who think she is great. Just because she went over to the Dark Side after Carter does not really matter so much. She was passionate and dedicated to this country and all Americans should find her to be a hero – especially the feminists. (Note: I consider myself a feminist as is my wife) |
Sounds like a very interesting person. I haven’t studied her writings all that much. So far, what I’ve read about her sounds good to me. |
Devyn, I’m thinking more of Naomi Wolfe’s statement to the effect that Jeane Kirkpatrick was false to her female side, so much so that she was a poor role model because she gave the impression that she lacked a uterus. Although I cannot think of a much more vile things to say of a woman (who, incidentally, had three sons), it’s not like other feminists objected or took her to ask over it. |
I wonder if she’d be confirmed today as Ambassador to the U.N. or if she would suffer Bolton’s fate. “What takes place in the Security Council more closely resembles a mugging than either a political debate or an effort at problem-solving.” “As I watched the behavior of the nations of the U.N. (including our own), I found no reasonable ground to expect any one of those governments to transcend permanently their own national interests for those of another country.” And here’s a personal favorite. (Please pardon the cheap shot.) |
#3, I agree with Devyn. Could be that all the other feminists disgreed with Ms. Wolfe’s rude remarks, which are more laughable than vile. Unfortunately, women are subjected to insults much worse than “you don’t have a uterus” these days. |
ECS, people in general are often subject to ruder remarks — and many of them are entirely appropriate, because not all discourse can be polite, and rudeness in not bad per se. Nevertheless, there’s something especially objectionable to sex-specific scorn such as this one. Wolfe is saying that Kirkpatrick was in some sense untrue to her sex, repeating Friedan’s favorite accusation against especially accomplished-women who didn’t site her or some school of second-wave feminism as paving the way to their success (which seems to be a pretty large majority, when you actually bother to count). If you can find very many prominent writers or public figures who registered objection to Naomi Wolfe’s statement, yet who are not a conservative (e.g., Robert Bork in his book Slouching towards Gomorrah or Jonah Goldberg right here), then I’ll buy your statement that “all other feminists disagreed with Ms. Wolfe’s rude remarks.” Nevertheless, I’ll concede that it may well be the case that decades after Wolfe’s sexist comment, Kirkpratrick has become more palatable to feminists. Nowadays, there’s a myth of female-success-being-enabled-by-feminism that’s accepted uncritically as conventional wisdom, so that nobody pays attention to whether or not notably successful women pay homage to feminism. The problem is that you can’t site feminism as the major enabler of success among women when it played no easily discernible role in the careers of the most notably successful women of that era (e.g., Margaret Thatcher, Sandra Day O’Connor, Elizabeth Dole, Jeanne Kirkpatrick). Once this myth of female-success-being-enabled-by-feminism is exploded, the only thing left is a bunch of needlessly obscure and far fetched literary criticism. This isn’t nearly enough for feminists like Wolfe or Friedan; hence their hated women like Kirkpatrick and Schlafly. |
One of the highlights of my freshman year at Wabash College was attending a dinner where Jeanne Kirkpatrick spoke. |
James, that was before I arrived at Wabash, but I do remember learning about that dinner. It made me think, “Why couldn’t BYU have thrown me out earlier?” I suppose I should have been wondering, “Why did I even bother go to BYU to begin with?” (Though I did meet my wife there.) |