30 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Same reaction here, Devyn, right down to the Watchtower comparison. The appearance so annoying that I can’t read the print edition even in private. The photographs aren’t usually too bad, but the highly colored, overly posed, poorly executed paintings are dreadful, and printed words on top of colored illustrations are very difficult for my failing eyesight to make out, too. When you read the Ensign online without the weird line spacing of the print edition, you also become aware of how few words appear in the magazine. You notice how short each article is, and how few articles are printed. I wonder if the Ensign carries 10% of the word count of, say, a 1950s Improvement Era. |
I don’t read the Ensign. The First Presidency message is about all I read. The rest is…well…I just don’t care for it. It is trivial, light, shallow reading, at least that’s what I find. I have trouble with the text, personally, not just the images. I wonder, though, how could it be improved on…. |
I wonder if the articles are short because they have to be translated into many different languages. Anyone know how many languages the Ensign gets translated into? I have no idea. |
They were short before the Ensign truly went international. |
So 0 for 2 on people liking the Ensign. Good insight on the short articles Ardis – probably to water it down for the masses is my guess. It really follows all of the lesson manuals these days – very little meat in them. Dan – How could it be improved on? I would think that actually hiring professional writers instead of asking GAs or BYU Profs to write a lot of the articles and making it a professional looking magazine like Time would at least get it away from looking like the Watchtower. Also I think that there has been some marked improvement in the content in the last 5 years or so as we see articles about things that members struggle with like homosexuality, pornography, abuse, etc. At least there are not quite so many fluffy articles about the perfect Mormon family. |
When I take the time to read it, I can find Ensign articles to be uplifting and worthwhile. The problem is that I don’t always take time to read it. I wouldn’t say I’m ashamed of the Ensign. The Watchtower is actually a LOT worse. I’ll occasionally pick up a copy if it’s available somewhere and try to read it. Frankly, Jehovah’s Witness literature gives me a headache. |
Devyn, I think the problem the First Presidency will have with more scholarly work is that the Ensign is vetted to ensure doctrine is sound. Can the Brethren take more time to review a more scholarly piece on a monthly basis? Scholarly work takes far longer to ensure it is doctrinally sound than some fluffy piece from your local relief society president. Do the Brethren have the time? Perhaps they should increase the size of the Seventy and make it a calling to the new Seventy to do just this. But that’s an uninspired recommendation, not based on prayerful consideration. :) |
Dan – |
Devyn S: The models tend to be white and beautiful, not reflective of the Church as a whole. I’m all for the models in the magazine being fat and ugly. I can understand why you’d be a bit shy about reading it. I don’t tend to be bothered by reading the Ensign in public, but then I regularly read comic books like Queen and Country, Powers, or The Authority in public (or on the subway, before I drove into work), so take that for what it’s worth. |
DKL – that is the big difference between you and I – you are not shy in probably any circumstance, whereas I tend to be in public. I like the fat and ugly perspective – as anyone knows step into any chapel in the world and you will see more fat and ugly Mormons than attractive just because of the demographics of “attractive” vs “non atractive” people… (Full disclosure – I am not in the attractive category unlike DKL) |
May and November are the only months that I read. Thats because these are the ones with the General Conference addresses in them. Not too many pictures and if there are pictures they are photographs and not paintings or drawings. |
Well, for those who really like that sort of thing, page 20 of the December Ensign has a drawing of a fat supermarket checker, gender undeterminable. |
John, I saw that. The caption, I think, said that the name of the person depicted was Pat. I’m also all for more androgynous depictions of people in the Ensign. On a side note: They have those stories in the back that people send in, along with the drawings that depict scenes from the stories. I always knew that they probably did not resemble the people that they were supposed to depict, but still just kinda’ wondered. Then, a guy in our ward sent in a story and it got published. And, guess what? The drawing bore no resemblance to him whatsoever. It’s kind of like how all the handcart pioneers are always portrayed as being impeccably groomed, as though they showered, shaved, and combed their hair every morning before continuing their trek west. |
Ah Devyn, Great post. I didn’t even know I felt this way until I took the Ensign to my youngest daughter’s dance class (where I thought I might have a quick minute to read). Suddenly, I saw the pictures through a non-member’s eyes. I hadn’t realized until then how fanatical the magazine may be perceived. I am so accustomed to the trademark LDS look. I still take it and read it because it is the only alone time I have. Plus, being married to DKL you quickly stop caring what people think of you… Just joking, DKL Honey! Devyn, I am not in the attractive category unlike DKL Ha! So Not True (I mean I agree with the part where you say DKL is attractive). But you really shouldn’t go around misleading the general public like this. For all those who do not know Devyn — He is a very attractive man. A rare mix of charm, wit, intelligence and ruddy good looks. |
I understand why the content of the Ensign is what it is, and why they use the font/line spacing they use, and I really don’t fault it for being what it is. It serves a necessary purpose. I don’t even think the Ensign needs to be all things to all people. Of all the LDS in the world, English-speaking North Americans have the least reason imaginable to complain about the availability of “meat” since we have so many other venues to fill any gap we feel. Yes, it would be nice to have more from a vetted source, and it would be nice to take it for granted that everybody in the ward has been exposed to the same ideas for classroom discussion, but still, we aren’t exactly starving for LDS reading matter. But why the *appearance* has to be so second rate, I cannot understand. I wouldn’t consider giving a subscription to non-member clients, although I wouldn’t hesitate if the magazine contained exactly the same words without the garish illustrations. |
It’s no big deal here in Utah. I take my old church magazines and leave them at the courthouse for the convicts to read before their sentencing. |
If you want the international version of the Ensign, subscribe to the English language Liahona. The covers are the same, the articles are mostly the same, but the interior photos and models are often different, and the Liahona has some different articles too. I sort of know how you feel about the Nordic or WASP-ish models. I felt embarrassed when I gave out the Korean and Chinese editions of the September 2006 Liahona with the laughing blonde blue-eyed children on the front. But ya know, people aren’t as prejudiced or overly-sensitive as you think. Perhaps ya’ll just have a case of “white guilt,” and need one of those “absolution certificates” from Walter E. Williams so you quit feeling guilty for being white. No one need apologize or feel ashamed for being white, WASP-ish, Nordic, blonde, blue-eyed, physically fit, beautiful, or round-eyed! I was at a laundromat September 3, 2006 (moment #712). I left my English Ensign that I was reading on a table while I put my clothes in a dryer. A Hispanic-looking man was looking through it when I got back. I asked if he’d like a free copy in Spanish, and he said yes. So I went out to the car and gave him a copy of the Spanish Liahona just before he left. Fer cryin’ out loud, aren’t you guys supporters and defenders of the 1st Amendment? Doesn’t the freedom to speak in public (to anyone willing to listen) include the right to READ whatever you diddly-darn-well please? Is a devout Muslim going to feel any hesitation reading the Quran in public? Or a Southern Baptist the Bible? Fer cryin’ out loud, the Ensign is not as “bad” as you guys are making it out to be! Those “fluff pieces” carry messages of important basic doctrines that most of us hardly ever put into practice in our lives. But those articles show us the everyday kinds of events in which we can implement gospel principles. The Ensign, the Liahona, and the Book of Mormon are excellent conversation starters. Perhaps the reason we are “embarrassed” is that, in actuality, we are afraid to talk about religion in public, and we fear that our seat-mate on the airplane will use our reading material as a conversation starter and ask us something about our religion. I can testify from personal experience that once you get over that fear, marvelous things happen. You start to run into, even attract (and sometimes are led to) people who do want to talk about the gospel! Besides, there is nothing fanatical about the Ensign. There is nothing in it worthy of embarrassment. Another point is that people RESPECT other people who are not embarrassed about their religion and are sincere about it. That respect will lead THEM to initiate the conversation with YOU. So be careful about being ashamed of the Lord and his gospel. Luke 9:26 Once you get over the inhibition of saying the name of the church, the name of the Book of Mormon, and the name of the Savior in public, there can be presented to you all sorts of opportunities in which those names are very appropriate to verbalize. Devyn, by reading the Ensign in public you then give the Lord the opportunity to arrange circumstances so that the person sitting next to you can be someone who is curious about the church or the Book of Mormon, and THEY will start the conversation. Try it! I don’t usually initiate gospel conversation with Spanish-speakers, because it is already easy for them to acquire bilingual material. A Spanish Book of Mormon or Liahona is not as desireable or of interest to them, as a Telugu Book of Mormon would be to someone who speaks Telugu. But by having that English Ensign at the laundromat, and putting it down while going over to the dryers, I gave the curious Spanish-speaking man an opportunity to initiate the contact. And I didn’t plan it. It just happened. |
Dan, I disagree with your assessment that the Ensign articles (aside from the 1st presidency message) are fluff. The Ensign, in my opinion, gets a bad rap. As far as content goes, it is generally a well put-together magazine — but magazines by their very nature do not contain uniformly excellent content. Sure, many articles do appeal to readers with tastes that differ from my own, but I should be ashamed to give the impression that this makes them superficial or somehow beneath me. Besides, I find insightful articles in the Ensign with great regularity. There’s a certain class of people who adopt the position that the Ensign is beneath their level of sophistication. I think that this is rather too close to the Zoramite point of view for my comfort level. That said, the layout and the pictures just exude “Hey! I’m a religious magazine! Look at all the shiney happy people I portray!” It’s not a question of these elements being “in the world, but not of the world” — they’re definitely “of the world,” just the wrong one. |
Anngegb, you vigilante! Just leave it to the judge to decide what sentences the convicts receive. |
I like “Pat” and think that could be a good model… SKL – thanks for the kind words. Yes, I think you are right it is about not caring what others think. However, that is much easier said than done for some of us who are not married to DKL. Ardis – I agree completely, the content is usually not bad, but the appearance is… Annegb – you crack me up… |
Bookslinger – I agree that the content is usually not bad, however, I do think that the illustrations and pictures are just silly and cheesy. That is what is embarrassing to me. I have had missionary experiences while reading other Church literature – in fact, one of the best instruments I have found is “Dialogue” as people are intrigued by scholarly journals since I read that along with “Nature”. However, when I pull out the Ensign, I have no response like that. So I am glad it works for you, but not for me. And I happen to have two adopted children of color and I am very sensitive to the race issue, which the Ensign is not usually. DKL – agree on most of the content – except for that written by GAs who speak about science – that is usually laughable. The pictures do exude the “I am a religious magazine for fanatics” view – that is what I am embarrassed about. People on the East Coast already have a poor view of Mormonism without seeing fanatical literature. |
I look forward to receiving my Ensign magazine each month. |
Perhaps the main reason why I do not read the Ensign in public is because it only take about 15 minutes to read just about the entire thing. Also, I do a lot of reading in public–I ascribe the the Dennis Potter theory that you always have to have a book with you. In fact, one time in college my car broke down and Dennis was with me, without a book. He lamented the fact that he did not have a book while we waited for the tow truck. I noted that I was there and he determined I could serve as a sort of substitute. Ah, the good old days. Anyways, I have never had any one ask me what I am reading. IN fact, I never ask anyone what they are reading either. I always assume that if someone is reading that they would rather be left alone to read. I know I would. So, I am not certain that I need to worry all that much about what I read in public. |
Devyn S, Wayne L: Maybe we just have to accept that there is no possible way for a devout believer of the true church to be “cool” to a non-religious worldly person. However, I assure you that to sincere devout believers of other religions (or to anyone who is in a religious inquiry mode) people who are not afraid to be seen reading religious material in public are indeed “cool.” One can never be a righteous example to worldly people by adopting the worldly standard of ‘coolness.’ Jesus and his apostles were not part of the cool in-crowd, they were seen as “hicks from the sticks.” Much as Joseph Smith and his contemporaries. None of them were trendoids. Devyn, your comment #21 reminds me of the people in Lehi’s dream who left the path because they became ashamed when those in the great and spacious building mocked them. I assure you, neither the Ensign nor its graphics are fanatical. Maybe the process by which you have used to conclude such is somewhat influenced by the mockers in that big building over there. I will grant that the Ensign’s graphics are not as sophisticated, flashy, trendy, and “cool” as other top-notch national magazines. But I don’t want my gospel magazine coming to me in a sophisticated, flashy, trendy box either. We don’t want the Ensign to be another US, People, Newsweek, Time, Nature, National Geographic, or LL Bean catalog. I don’t think the gospel should be promulgated via that which is sophisticated, flashy, trendy, or hip. Perhaps that’s why we send out awkward unsophisticated 19 year olds in conservative suits. Sure, the Ensign needs some more people of color on the cover and in the graphics. But it is nowhere near as fanatical-appearing as material from some other church organizations I’ve seen, both Catholic and Protestant. Your fellow passengers commuting to work on the train in the liberal, scholarly, PBS-watching, fine-twined-linen-wearing East/Northeast are also likely much different than my contacts in the more blue-collar midwest. But sometimes, even well-dressed rich liberals go into religious inquiry mode, and if they are humble, they won’t mind the un-hipness of the magazine you’re reading. It’s an age old question: How far should we go in order to behave and make ourselves look like worldly people in order that we may establish rapport and open a communication channel with them? Is trying to look sophisticated a good thing or a bad thing when attempting dialogue with those who think they are sophisticated? I think there’s a reason why the church sends out 19 year-old dorky-looking kids instead of more sophisticated-looking representatives: If you can’t humble yourself sufficiently to receive religious instruction from 19 year olds, you’re likely not ready for the message anyway. BTW, subscribe to the English Liahona, at $10/year, in addition to the Ensign, it has slightly more color to it than the Ensign, as it is aimed at a non-English audience. I love to give them out. I subscribe to 2 English, 2 Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Spanish, French, Tagalog, and Korean editions of the Liahona. (Not all come out every month, some are 4 or 6 issues/year.) You can find them at http://www.ldscatalog.com, and click on Magazines. They are well-received at the correponding restaurants. |
Bookslinger – thanks for the comments. I think that in this liberal haven, I have had a lot more inquiries about what I was reading when I was reading books such as the Book of Mormon or Dialogue, not the Ensign. In fact, no one has ever asked what I was reading when it was the Ensign. So perhaps I am a wandering soul but I am somewhat conscious of what the people in the building are saying as they are the people I work with and live with everyday since the only other Mormons I see during any week are my family. |
Sister P – I am glad that you enjoy the Ensign and that it helps you. I think that the articles can be faith promoting, but I just don’t like the presentation. |
I hate the visiting teaching messages. There’s no way to really incorporate the content into a visit without being preachy. They don’t stimulate real interaction or closeness between sisters. |
Oh, but I enjoy the Ensign as a whole, I even read the other ones. I agree with DKL that the articles are becoming more involved and thoughtful. I wish they could be more personal, but I also realize they are addressing millions of people. |
Oh, and I was totally serious about leaving them in the courthouse. I started doing it after attending a trial in June and realizing there was nothing for people to read. I leave them many others, as well. They love it. Well, the police do. I claim a deduction on my taxes, also. Not a lot, just a little. |
annegb – ditto on the VT message. My wife pretty much ignores it in here VT visits. That is funny about the courthouse, probably not a bad idea and certainly a group who could use some good positive spirituality – particularly since most are/were Mormon at some point. The tax deduction is interesting – every little bit helps. |