15 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
It seems that during a 24 hour period, most folks would consume 3 full meals—not just two. I am now on a schedule with a trainer who has recommended 5 (though smaller) meals each day. So, is the answer in the technical amount of meals one consumes, or perhaps how one feels in their communion with the Spirit? |
The one that is right is the one that you can do without feeling guilty or smug. |
That’s a strange question coming from you, DKL. Like I need someone to give me rules when I can eat or not, sheesh. I suppose there are a few Mormons who just don’t feel right about their fast unless they have a rule to follow when doing it, but I feel quite confident of my own ability to figure out when I want to eat or when I choose to abstain. Besides, all they really want is the $20. The fasting thing just makes it easier to ask for the money. I’ll admit that I’m not a big fan of fasting: I find it just makes me hungry and grouchy rather than making me more spiritual or bringing me closer to God. I follow the “can’t teach the gospel to a man with an empty stomach” line of thinking, based on an apocryphal statement attributed to Brigham Young (and if he didn’t say it, he should have). |
Apparently someone in Kyrgyzstan told one of the early converts that Mormons fast on the first Sunday with no other clarification. So for about 2 years this convert started her fast on Saturday evening and didn’t end till Monday morning (there is no leadership or anyone else there to have told her anything different). I don’t know how long she fasts now, but we did tell her that she didn’t have to fast that long. Not much point to that except that I don’t think there is a right answer. It never occurred to me to wonder if there was a correct amount of time to fast. |
The right one is the one you feel is right, you know, the whole teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves thing. |
yeah, this seems to be a grey area for a lot of converts, myself included. no one ever explained it to me in enough detail for me to really “get” what was going on. i solved the problem by staying perpetually pregnant and/or nursing, ha! hey, was this covered in the october ensign? |
What’s weird to me are those who think fasting includes no drinking. Which sounds horribly unsafe. (Especially for me since I tend to dehydrate fast – especially here in the west) |
Clark, I agree about the water/drinking. In fact, my parents never taught me that at all. Then one time when I was a laurel and in a new ward, I was really confused when the other YW were horrified when I got a drink of water during church one fast sunday. I don’t know if I just have a blood sugar problem, but fasting or not, if I go without eating, by 1 oclock easy I have such a bad headache Im not even safe to drive. I start the day fasting, but since I eat the equivalent of five little meals (again, if I don’t have protein I can barely function), most people would consider my ‘third’ meal a lunch. I can’t say I feel bad about it at all, seems sorta like counting steps to define little things like this. |
I agree that fasting should be tailor-made to the situation. I think there is value in the mega-fast (24 hours or more, no food or water), but I’d restrict it to a time when I didn’t have to be physically active. Once as a missionary we fasted and knocked doors all day in the summer. I almost collapsed. That fast would only have had value had we stayed home and studied. |
I have been unable to fast since returning from my mission, but previously would fast for two meals. |
your question is so embarrassing it is laughable. tailor made, follow the spirit, get in touch with God. forget about how much time has gone by. |
Clark, people probably think they should abstain from water because that’s what is in Church-printed materials. From Primary stuff: To fast is to go without food or water. From Aaronic priesthood stuff: At first, most children and young people fast simply because their family does it or because they think it is the right thing to do. They may not have thought about why they should deny themselves food and water for a day. From The Friend: Dad: To fast means to go without eating and drinking. Jesus set the example Himself by fasting. Glen: I don’t know if I could go without food and water. Dad: It certainly isn’t easy, and Heavenly Father doesn’t expect little children to fast. When you are old enough and want to fast, it’s best to start out by missing just one meal. |
Two meals might mean different things to different people. I think that the 24 hours comes from the assumption that after dinner Saturday night you probably won’t eat anything, then breakfast and lunch are the two meals that are missed and then you eat dinner Sunday evening about the same time you ate dinner on Saturday. |
Feel free to correct me, but isn’t the official fasting period determined by an individual’s abilities? For example, if I go a full day without food you have to bring me to the hospital. Since no one wants to do that for me once a month I only fast from after dinner on Saturday until lunch time on Sunday. That’s the best I can do and I’m pretty sure the Lord will be alright with that. So, as long as you can fast the whole 24 hours without dying, passing out or moving your trashcan house next to Oscar’s on Sesame Street then you should do it. However, if you can’t, then well you can’t, and you should end it when you must or when the spirit has left you and you are actually considering blowing the tires out of the pizza guy’s car as he drives past you on your way home from church. |
Yes it is. For instance my wife is hyperglycimic (sp?) as are many women. That obviously affects ones ability to fast. |