36 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
The trouble with Obama is that you keep waiting for the other shoe to drop, but it never does. What’s his policy agenda? What’s he stand for? What’s his answer to the rather big problems facing America today? Still waiting… Obama is a great guy as far as I can tell. He’s highly intelligent, he sees both sides of the issue and respects the people on both sides. He always thinks things through carefully. He’s scrupulously candid and honest about himself and his past. He doesn’t employ any of the butt-covering BS common to most of the older baby-boom generation politicians. His inexperience actually works in his favor due to the fact we’ve had a really ugly last five years on Capitol Hill and all the more experienced politicians have emerged smelling pretty bad. And more importantly, he has the most likable personality and charm of any Democratic candidate since, well, Bill Clinton. So here I am after listening to him, mildly enthused, waiting expectantly for the next step. Still waiting… |
Seth R., I agree with what you are saying. My wife tends to be a little more liberal than I am on issues. She picked up Obama’s biography, a book which I previously had no interest in even seeing (I typically am not too excited about political biographies). I picked it up and ended up reading quite a bit of it. I was impressed with the writing and with many of his life experiences. I’m less concerned about Obama the man and more concerned about who will be around him. I think a charismatic, polished and intelligent figurehead can be very important – but often it’s the players on the team who end up influencing crucial policy decisions. So I’m wondering who Obama will have around/behind him. |
“Valerie Plame is quite pretty. They should make a movie. I wonder if she killed anybody or slept with a Russian to get information. I wonder what kind of spy she was. I don’t really care about the scandal involving Libby, etc.” Gee whiz, I can see why Mormons get a reputation for sexism. She was, by all accounts, a very competent spy who could have served as a station chief or senior analyst. Instead, she is being forced to leave the agency, because her cover is blown and thus her value destroyed by “Libby, etc.” We should all care when a woman’s career is demolished. Not to mention that in this case, her work kept our lives safer. Our grandchildren will suffer for this act of treason. |
Um, I think all spies sleep around. Don’t you watch James Bond? I think it’s pretty much in their job description. And you know what? Call me a sexist if you want, but don’t equate it in any way with Mormons. I would be the same way if I were a Catholic. In this case religion has nothing to do with my opinions. Seth, Daniel, this is exactly how I feel. I really really liked Bill Clinton and I’m so afraid the **** is going to hit the fan here and I’m going to be disappointed. It is just heartbreakingly sad that Americans are looking for genuine public servants. |
Niasmith: She was, by all accounts, a very competent spy who could have served as a station chief or senior analyst. Instead, she is being forced to leave the agency, because her cover is blown and thus her value destroyed by “Libby, etc.” This is nonsense. Honestly, so much misinformation abounds among those who rely on NPR for “news” (using the sad excuse “well, all news outlets are biased”) that it’s strengthening my testimony that natural man is an enemy to God. Plame was not a spy, and she was not undercover, so there was no cover to be blown. Her employment there was classified, because all employment at the CIA is classified. My mother used to work for the CIA, and that was classified. Perhaps it still is. Maybe I just broke the law and discredited her spouse. Plame’s name was leaked by Armitage (not Libby or Rove — do you even know what Libby was convicted of?), a guy at the state department who opposes the Iraq war, and who by all accounts (including Bob Woodward, and we all know what a frothing-at-the mouth conservative he is) had no political axe to grind. And everyone who couldn’t care less about whether Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick is suddenly bemoaning the career advancement opportunities of a mid-level government employee. Well, I guarantee you this: Nothing worse will happen to Plame than happened to Linda Tripp. |
Yes DKL, NPR is biased, just like all news outlets. But it does a far far better job of covering all the angles than the other news orgs. And you haven’t said anything that NPR’s news coverage hasn’t already pointed out and covered. The difference is that NPR’s news coverage isn’t stupid. Whereas ABC, NBC, Fox, and CBS are a never-ending parade of inane and worthless news coverage, punctuated by inane and worthless commercial messages. And where exactly would YOU recommend I get my news each morning? |
Chris Rock did run for president. I saw the movie. I don’t think anybody else saw it though. Not exactly a classic. |
Obama’s site was selling “O’bama” shirts, in green, for St. Patrick’s Day, but unfortunately, I didn’t see them in time to order. Unfortunately, there’s still another St. Patrick’s Day before the election, so maybe next year…. I was extremely impressed with his speech at the 2004 convention, and then his biography just clinched the deal for me. I just want someone who’s intelligent and has a bit of intellectual curiosity and hasn’t been raised with a sense of entitlement for the next president. |
Seth R: And where exactly would YOU recommend I get my news each morning? Why, The Christian Science Monitor, of course. (I used to listen to NPR, back when there was still a Christian Science Newswire. The BBC, though sometimes refreshingly crude, is pretty mediocre overall. The rest of NPR is pretentious dribble aimed at enabling ignorant people to sound clever in casual conversations about topics they know nothing about; like makeup for ugly men, if you will. I put The New Yorker in the same category — though some time ago they had an interesting article on feral pigs, the magazine is altogether mind-numbing for anyone who is reasonably well-informed.) |
Re: Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Romney. Why not have a black, a woman, and a Mormon be president all at once? Write in Gladys Knight. |
Has anyone else noticed that the media has dropped the “Rodham” from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s name? When Bill Clinton was president, didn’t the media always include “Rodham” in her name? |
For two years, CBS news referred to Dan Quayle as J. Danforth Quayle, III. Thing is, he was the first Jay Danforth Quayle. Jay Danforth was a WWII buddy of Dan Quayle’s father who died in battle. Dan Quayle was named for him. That didn’t stop CBS from tagging “the third” onto his name to make him sound like a rich-kid. |
DKL Dan Quayle is/was a rich kid, at least during the time fame CBS News might have used this designation. |
DKL Ms. Plame herself testified exactly to the contrary, under oath, before the Congress yesterday. |
The point isn’t how rich he is, but that CBS makes things up out of whole cloth. Using forged documents to smear the president 40 days before an election is another easy example. These kinds of things are far worse than any alleged imbalance at Fox. It’s also worth noting that there aren’t any poor national politicians. Only the affluent can afford the time-off and the risk to their career to run. As far as executives (President or Vice President): The last poor executive was Truman, for whom the Presidential pension was created on account of the fact that, beyond the meager sum he negotiated for his memoirs, he had hardly a penny to his name. |
I’m certain CBS has its indiscretions (though making Dan Quayle out to be rich is not one of them). You’re overall larger point about only the rich being able to afford political office in this country, is not only true; but, quite troubling as well. Long gone are the days of the citizen politician, and we are a more poorly governed nation as a result. |
Annegb: Marilyn, Brittany and the other young women like them made a series of choices during life that have lead them to the paths in which they find or found themselves. As you suggest, money probably did not help, and in fact likely gave them certain freedoms the rest of us do not have to make some of the choices they have made. As for Robert Kennedy, in my opinion America would have been a much better and different country today, had he not been killed, and had he defeated Richard Nixon in 1968. |
Regarding NPR as a news source, I was actually thinking of a Washington Post piece last fall, but whatever. “Plame was not a spy, and she was not undercover, so there was no cover to be blown.” So do you think she was lying under oath when she said (according to yesterday’s NYT) that her outing, “jeopardized and even destroyed entire networks of foreign agents, who in turn risk their own lives and those of their families to provide the United States with needed intelligence”? |
Guy, this is the problem with relying on NPR. They report that Plame has been saying that she’s undercover, but the CIA never (as a policy) discloses the nature of anyone’s employment, so that she can say whatever she wants. The only problem is that anyone who’s actually checked into the facts surrounding her “undercover” role has found them to be impossible. For example, last September the Chicago Tribune published an article that shows definitively that (in spite of what sources like the New York Times had been reporting) it was nearly impossible for her role to have actually been undercover. Her address had been listed in public records as the US Embassy in Athens, where junior employees were aware that she was a CIA employee. Then there’s the fact that she was stationed at CIA headquarters during the 1990s(!). So yes, Naismith, I think that Plame is lying under oath. One wonders whether anyone will actually go after her for perjury. Darling of the Democrats that she is, it’s not likely. Guy, Regarding Quayle, you must know that I’m not just complaining that they were “making him out to be rich.” CBS actually invented a fictitious name to use real news broadcasts in order to further an image of him that was consistent with their political goals. Why do they hide behind lies, when (as you point out) the truth is so obvious? |
“Um, I think all spies sleep around. Don’t you watch James Bond? I think it’s pretty much in their job description.” I am sure you are trying to be funny, and I am taking this far too seriously, but it is not funny to me. My brother is serving in the Army in Iraq, and if anything happens to him, at least we will know, and get the body back. For the families of Americans who fight the war against terror by serving in intelligence agencies, the families may not get the body back, they won’t even know where their loved ones were serving, they may not even know what their job was. And disproportionately, those families are likely to be LDS families. Those of our faith is over-represented in such agencies, because of the language skills that returned missionaries bring, and the clean background that simplifies security clearances. We had a young man who was in our ward who spent a summer in the mideast practicing Arabic. While he is headed off to graduate school in international relations, he hopes to eventually do that kind of work. He sees it as a way to serve our nation and make a difference. I know his wife, and have met his parents, and I appreciate his sacrifice, and theirs. There is nothing funny about it. It’s a sad reality that we need spies, but they are even mentioned in the Book of Mormon. |
DKL, Actually NPR was a source I just happened to use here. I’m certain dozens of other news outlets covered her testimony (perhaps even Fox News). I personally saw Plame testify under oath via CNN’s Pipeline and found her to be a credible witness. If she perjured herself, I’m certain there are remedies for such perjury. Let’s see where it goes. I would argue that the most substantive facts came out under questioning under oath at the congressional hearing. I found it interesting that most republican members of the committee didn’t even bother to show up and do their job by conducting and participating in the hearing. Certainly, I would think that if three were actual evidence that she was not undercover that the republican minority would have been there with that evidence and trumpeted it from the roof tops as it were. I’m just busting your chops about Quayle. (Though in a sense I think it’s an easy case to make that one who has his net worth is likely somewhat of an elitest–regardless of what CBS says). I haven’t been much a fan of CBS news since Cronkite retired. I have always detested Dan Rather. |
DKL, Thanks for the endorsement of the CSM. But you’ll have to do more to discredit NPR in my mind than sneer in a suitably dastardly fashion. |
Guy: I have always detested Dan Rather. That’s what I love about you, Guy. We can always find common ground no matter how deep our disagreements run! |
I can’t figure out why ya’ll are so worried about NPR and Dan Rather when you’re missing the real issue here. There are, like, ten 7-year-old kids on dirt bikes out on my sidewalk, and not a single hand-cuff slapping cop to drag them off to prison where they belong. |
Why bother reading/watching the news? Just get your advisors to tell you what’s going on. Actually, I gave up on watching the tv news or reading the paper. I just read everything online. I go to all the major news sources and alternative ones to get my news. |
#10 Bookslinger: That is a really great idea. #13 & #17 Guy: I think they’re all rich kids. Poor people don’t run for president. And yeah, those stupid girls are asking for trouble. But there’s always a creep around ready to take advantage of their stupidity. I don’t know if Robert Kennedy would have made a good president or not. I don’t have an opinion. Well, I have mixed emotions. But, I sure do wonder where our country would be if McGovern would have won. He was a good man. Naismith, I wasn’t trying to be funny. I seriously wondered what she did as a spy–and I assume that female spies use sex to get information. It sort of makes sense to me. Well, the second time I was jesting a bit with you. James Bond was a slut. I appreciate your point, though. You are absolutely right and I never thought of it that way. I honestly had no idea that many of these people were LDS. We never think of those unsung heroes. DKL, I’m going to check out the Christian Science Monitor. Okay, David, don’t wet your pants, but I actually like George Stephanopolous. I think he sees the flaws in his party and is vaguely unbiased. He’s sort of a nice Dick Morris, who I love to listen to. I don’t believe everything he says, but I enjoy him. Bill O Reilly bothers me, Ann Coulter sort of makes me nauseous, Bill Maher has a filthy mind, Jon Stewart is pretty good. I know, I know, they’re comedians. So are all the rest of them. |
This is funny. I thought the Department of Justice was under Alberto Gonzalez (R), though I allow it might have changed last night, as I wasn’t listening to the news. |
Annegb: Yes, another excellent candidate. The country twice had an opportunity to avoid the nightmare of Richard Nixon; but like George Bush, was elected twice (well ok once anyway). McGovern was unfairly painted as a pacifist because of his opposition to the Vietnam War, when in fact he was a war hero serving in WWII. His his patriotism was questioned just as those today who oppose the Iraq war. McGovern was as honest as the day was long, was a true war hero, and would have made an excellent president–much, much better than what America settled for. You have some good political insights Annegb (except for that George Bush thing you have going). |
In considering Gladys Knight as a presidential candidate, forget about the fact she is black/female/Mormon. The important thing is she can sing! |
Yes, Guy. George McGovern was a real War Hero, and he had a lot of personal humility as well. So much so that he never so much as mentioned his valor in public. In fact, McGovern is my reference point in this regard, and he’s why I dismiss candidates out-of–hand when I see jockeying for the position of war-hero as a campaign tactic. I do think that those who question the Iraq war get a pretty decent hearing. When Murtha proposed the pullout, there a debate set up on the resolution. The debate was mostly a sham, because it simply gave congressman somewhere to say things that they could use as pull-quotes in their re-election literature. But aside from that, they bent over backwards to say that they believed that Murtha wasn’t being disloyal. annegb, I also use the Drudge Report as my primary touch point for what’s happening in the world (current events, pop culture happenings, and weird goings-on). You can find NPR stations here, though I advise against it. |
DKL: We share more common ground in re: George McGovern I don’t want to turn this into a thread jack on Iraq, so I’ll just say on that issue we have less common ground. And, both Annegb and DKL, might I suggest this as a better source than Drudge? ;-) |
I thought Ariana Huffington was a Republican. |
No, she only married one! |
Again, I don’t know if I am being too serious, but I have a great deal of respect for ABC News because the things I actually know about professionally–polling and science reporting–they do a very responsible job. All the networks having polling units which conduct polls for them, but ABC News also requires that any story reporting on polls or surveys or studies or basically anything with a “percent” must be vetted by their polling unit, which includes folks with a PhD in social science. As a result, ABC News refuses to report quite a few stories that are picked up by other news outlets, or issues caveats along with the data, and they sometimes prompt researchers to issue a correction. You know that recent piece about so many more women not being married? They figured out that it included girls down to 15 years old, as well as widows. Remember the study a few years back about young people drinking so much alcohol? They figured out the problem with a study from John Hopkins. I also appreciate that when their polling data is released, they always make the technical report available on their website by the time something is aired, so if you see numbers flash up and aren’t sure whether it was registered voters or likely voters or registered Republicans, you can flip to that immediately. They also conducted the first representative poll of the Iraqi population, in Feb 2004. I don’t know if they are as strong in other areas such as foreign affairs, but I would guess that if they go to that much trouble and expense for my areas, they invest in quality in other aspects as well. |
Naismith, you have every right to take anything as seriously as you wish. If this is an important issue to you and you feel strongly about it, go with it. That’s the beauty of blogging for me. I step on toes, oh well, we can all take it or we wouldn’t be here. I’ve felt a little better about ABC than NBC or CBS. Katie Couric’s bias was written all over her face after the election and I haven’t watched her since. I’ve watched the Today Show, but when she comes on, I change the channel. Although Bill did have a colonoscopy because of her. There is that. Has anybody noticed I tend to cover every side of an issue? It’s because I’m a Libra. No lie. |
“I used to read Drudge every day, I’m so busy now it’s sporadic. But it’s basically where I turn to for the news.” this explains everything! |