24 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Was Chuck-A-Rama all booked up? |
AWESOME POST! (Hey Devyn, I think you’re duty bound to step in here and challenge Tagore to a duel in defense of C-A-R.) |
*lol* |
gst: Sigh. Golden Corral is clearly the superior buffet so there was no need to check CAR. Now, Golden Corral is not a good buffet– see the Rule– but it is better than CAR. (Devyn, I’ve thrown down the gauntlet.) This would never happen at Golden Corral: http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,595059925,00.html |
When I was younger, I’d try to eat as much as possible in order to make sure that the buffet was a good value. Now, I can’t eat that much without putting on weight. So I eat less at buffets nowadays, but I break a few plates and throw away some flatware to compensate |
This is a classic post, but for cheapskates with kids (like me – and only at this point in my life) I’ll keep using my food stamps, lol. However when I went to Vegas I always chose the 20 buck plus rule. Good post. |
Maybe we could add another rule – the buffet does not have a guy slowly cutting you a single paper-thin slice of pot roast after you’ve waited in a line of other people waiting for a single paper-thin slice of pot roast. A good buffet lets you cut your own. But I’m not sure such a place exists in the telestial world. |
Finally monsieur, a wafer thin mint. |
I am completely appalled that my fellow MMers would have the gall to think that GC is better than CAR… Perhaps CAR has gone downhill since SKL and I worked there, but it was glorious place then – all the fat people in Utah were happy as were as the geriatrics… good times… And now Tagore has to spoil these memories, no desecrate my lovely memories just because he regrets his choice of a wedding breakfast… Last time I ate at CAR it was still pretty good – of course not quite as good as the good old days in the early 1990′s when we used powdered potato flakes. |
So how many slices of roast beef would Golden Corral allow me to put away? Also, at what point does the restaurant keep a running total of how many slices you’ve been served? |
At CAR the person cutting the meat would just keep on eye on things – in the five years I was there, we never told anyone they had enough, although I know a lot of people would eat so much it made me sick watching them… You just have to be sweet to the meat carver – if they like you, you will get a bigger slice… |
I can’t remain silent anymore: I’m with the Chuck-a-Rama crowd. The food was better, to be sure. And when I used to eat there, they had the best looking chick in Utah working there. She’s one hot babe. Pretty big draw for the Orem restaurant, I’m sure. And the Orem restaurant was right next to Wendy’s, so I could pick up a grilled chicken sandwich at the drive-through on the way home. Plus, there’s the issue of the name. Sure, Chuck-a-Rama sounds a bit corny, but at least a chuck is where humans eat. But human’s don’t eat at corrals, and the name Golden Corral sounds more like nirvana for livestock than a proper place to eat. |
Every year or so I go to Chuck-a-Rama. Upon gnawing on their dry, dry fried chicken, trying to ingest the watery, runny macaroni and cheese, and attempting to consume the sickly sweet mashed potatoes, I regret it, and resolve never to go back. Then a year or so later, it seems like a good idea again. I can’t explain it. |
My 8 and 6 year old kids favorite place to eat is Old Country Buffet. Yuck. |
I’m not a Golden Corral apologist, but I realize there’s some strong CAR bias here and I feel compelled to defend GC to keep the discussion honest. DKL makes an excellent point about the chuck vs. the corral. But then, CAR’s name is way too conducive to the “Up-Chuck-a-Rama” moniker. Also, we should all be more than a bit wary of a buffet self-proclaiming itself, “The tastiest buffet in town.” There are simply no empirical data to back up that arrogant claim. |
Where do Brazilian all you can eat churrascarias fall on this spectrum? There is a Braza Grill on State Street and about 59th South in SLC that is reasonable for lunch and very tasty. |
ARJ – Brazilian buffets are a different class in my mind… Tagore – There is CAR bias given that some of us spent the better part of 5 years slaving away there. Plus, pretty much all of my dates during college and all of my friends from college emanated from there. So even if the food sucks, it certainly made a deep and lasting impact on me – hey, that is where I met DKL… But “up chuck a rama” versus “golden corral – come feed with the cattle” I would rather puke than eat with the cattle – of course, I would rather eat at a Brazilian buffet anyday… |
There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding here about the word “corral.” In addition to a cattle pen, a corral is also “an enclosure made with wagons for defense of an encampment.” This connotes Mormon pioneers, banding together, humbly eating their evening meal. I can’t think of a better way to pay respect to our pioneer ancestors than to sup at the Golden Corral. Even if corral was an animal pen, what about the Christ child born in a manager? Wouldn’t you rather eat a meal with Baby Jesus than with a bunch of dirty ranch hands at the chuck? |
I am not qualified to comment on CAR, but in my Atlanta ward the High Priests quorum could not function w/o their regular meetings at the local Golden Corral. Expanding the geographic scope a little, there are marvelous, large buffets in Amish country. I agree about the rule, but cannot believe the part about Tagore holding his wedding breakfast at a buffet. That smacks of the funnier parts of Banner of Heaven. |
It was a large wedding party of people with very hearty appetites. How else were we to provide the quantity and variety, all at one low price? |
re: 20. If your story is true, then I admire your ability to flaunt tradition/social norms and find a practical solution to a big problem. True or not, it’s still funny. Were the wedding guests at the breakfast buffet already decked out for the wedding? That must have been quite a sight. Did you also dispense with a tux in favor of a white shirt and sans-a-belt pants so as to better enjoy the buffet? |
#18 – I think I would rather eat with the cow hands than Christ at this point in my life. It would be a lot less pressure… |
Would the loaves and the fishes be considered the first “All-You-Can-Eat” buffet? |
#24. Didn’t I see you at Chuck-A-Rama? |