7 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
A fascinating article, but it dances around the fact that yesterday’s silver is today’s lusterware. See Polygamy… Indeed, a large part of my own frustration with the gospel is not being able to tell what is silver and what is lusterware. |
I love this essay too (it’s also reprinted in All God’s Critters Got a Place in the Choir which has a number of Ulrich’s essays). |
I found Sister Ulrich’s wonderful essay sometime, somewhere–I don’t remember, and I have it in my files. The pages are a bit battered, but I re-read it once in awhile. Such wisdom. Every member of the church should read it. |
AML – good point. I think that things that are lusterware for me may not be lusterware for others, and may, in fact, be silver for someone else. That is the beauty of the Gospel to me – it is tailored to fit each of us (within reason). Therefore, I have found my silver I can latch onto (e.g., Divinity of Christ, Prophet Joseph Smith), while other people’s silver is my luster (e.g., Templework, focus on males in the Church). It certainly makes things a bit uncomfortable sometimes when I have a disagreement with someone – such as role of women, but, in the end, I still have my silver… |
It’s nice I suppose, but I’d be sorry to see the bloggernacle lose its luster. |
I love that essay too, Devyn, but I didn’t interpret lusterware the way you do. The essay is built upon Emily Dickinson’s poem “It dropped so low in my regard.” It dropped so low – in my Regard- Yet blamed the Fate that fractured – less There are the real things, and then there is the lusterware. The lusterware is not the stuff that matters to somebody else but not to you. The lusterware is the false image of a true thing. There’s the real Joseph Smith, the dynamic, passionate American prophet, called by God in spite of his sins and flaws. And then there’s the lusterware Joseph Smith, the false image we have of Joseph Smith, who Ulrich described (from memory) as ever-young, ever-handsome, ever-wise. That’s a false Joseph Smith, and it won’t hold up if you drop it. But I haven’t read the essay in several months. I had forgotten about shining the silver. Somebody (ok, me) needs to write to the Exponent II folks and beg them to get Dr. Ulrich to let them post this essay online. |
Ann – I like your interpretation as well. I must say I prefer my interpretation as I agree that my lusterware matters to me, but it is not a false image, it is merely something I like to keep on the shelf and shine a lot, sometimes to the detriment of the true silver in my life. I agree on the Exponent II contact – I personally love that periodical even if I am excluded from writing in it given my sex… |