31 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Ummmmmmmm Great questions. They do not lend themselves to the nice neat little sunday school answers that we often try to apply to really great questions. These will be added to the many questions I have no answers to. |
Some, even amongst the bloggernaclites, theorize that despite our common interpretation of the King Follett Discourse, we are not actually of the same being and kind as God; rather, Gods like the Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit are different from us in some ontologically significant way, which would presumably include qualification for disembodied godhood. This would also imply that we are not in fact literally the spirit children of God, a theory which also has firm ground in Joseph Smith’s teachings. The question of how might we be both co-eternal with God (as Joseph teaches) and simultaneously his children is one any number of Mormon theologians have wrestled with. |
So important for our eternal salvation… ;) Here’s a counter question. Where does one get the assumption that one has to have a physical body to qualify as part of the Godhead? |
Aren’t questions like this too technical to be of any practical value (day-by-day)-benefit? |
These are the kinds of questions that make me glad I will never be a High Priest. |
How many angels can fit on the head of a pin? |
My wife always found a certain emotional appeal in the possibility that the Holy Ghost might actually be female. |
Heh. Actually, few of our HP group lessons are quite this interesting. But even I was a bit stumped on this one, and I’m sort of the “go-to guy” for the group for obscure doctrinal and historical questions. ..bruce.. |
Bruce, I’m under the impression that this and related questions are what have caused J.Stapley at BCC to reject elder brotherhood and insist that there is an ontological divide between us and Christ. Geoff J at New Cool Thang has taken a different tack, embracing multiple mortal probations as the solution to this problem. I’m pretty sure that both agree that the model of progression currently taught in the LDS Church doesn’t (and perhaps can’t) address this concern. |
esoteric Qs like this one (no offense intended) support my view that the Basics of Christian Living are being ‘overshadowed’ by far-reaching if not pointless questions-considerations… |
Guy, Get off your high horse and your thread jack. This is a basic question of Mormon theology. Maybe you are the type of mindless follower that never thought to ask such questions? Were you the robot that you now hate? |
Bruce – great questions. These are certainly not the type of things my HPG ever discusses. Too bad. I think that I find the comments here quite compelling – particularly Matt and Seth’s. |
I ‘just’ don’t see ANY practical application here, this has Nothing to do with (your assumption-conclusion-allegation that I’m on a ) ‘being on a high horse’,Nothing Whatsoever… |
Bruce, You didn’t answer my counter question. Why do we assume that one must have a physical body to be a part of the Godhead? |
Dan–but do we? Is the Holy Ghost not a spirit? |
Guy, It is absolutely a high horse. And too predictable. Unless you’re interested in the topic of discussion, don’t butt in with demeaning comments. You are proving to be a very bad Christian. As for your question #4, It is questions like this that help one to understand God, to have faith in the first place. If you don’t believe in God and have no understanding of Him, then your morals are simply an effort to be a nice person- honorable, though probably a dead-end and of no redeeming value. So tell me, is such discussion so disconnected from the two great commandments and WHO they came from in the first place- who we try to obey? If that does not make sense to you and you cannot discuss the topic on its merits, I vote you be banned for being nothing more than an anti-Mormon basher with only insults to contribute. I am irritated and offended by you. Should I continue to spend less and less time away from this site until I decide to not return? How should we go about this? Are you simply the exact thing that drove you from the Church? |
*Possible Heresy Warning* This is the type of Question that Adam-God (that damnable doctrinal pariah!) attempted to answer, by suggesting, as quoted above “multiple [hierarchical] mortal probations”. Having read up a fair amount on it, I see it as a possibility. Other explanations I have heard include: A line of Christs, from which one “borrows” saviors for their realm of creation on the Holy Ghost: I have heard it persuasively said the Holy Ghost, is an office that one fills only for a time. Thus many people could be, or have been the Holy Ghost. |
Possible answer…(From a non-HP) |
We don’t, obviously, though we do tie exaltation to resurrection. But that wasn’t my point (and I can see that I worded things a bit ambiguously.) What I was asking is: what distinguished both Christ and the Holy Ghost from all the rest of us spirit children such that they were chosen and function in the Godhead? Why was Christ chosen to be the ‘firstborn’ of the spirit children? Why was the Holy Ghost chosen among all of us to act as such? I pretty much put this in the “things I’ll find out later” list, but I was a bit startled in HP group meeting to realize that I had never really thought about this before. ..bruce.. |
ESO, #15, Yes, we do. That’s the basic assumption of the question laid out by Bruce. His question is:
My counter question takes the “while still an unembodied spirit” from the question itself. Bruce’s question (or the question raised in priesthood class) assumes that members of the Godhead must have an embodied spirit to be a member. Basically what I’m saying is that that particular angle is moot. Because the Holy Ghost is an unembodied spirit, yet still a member of the Godhead, it shows that not having a body is not a disqualification from being in the Godhead. So then the question really is: “What qualified Christ to become part of the Godhead while still an unembodied spirit?” |
Bah, there was supposed to be a line crossing out the “while still an unembodied spirit” part. My #20 was written before Bruce’s #19. :) |
Bruce #19, As to your restated question, Jesus Christ ‘qualified’ to be in the Godhead because he was the Firstborn, the Only Begotten. One thing I’ve learned from reading Abraham 3 is that there is a hierarchy to the way of things in the universe and in life.
The Only Begotten, the Firstborn is the greatest of us all, of Heavenly Father’s children. It makes sense that he is at the top, and a participant in the Godhead. As to the Holy Ghost, His story isn’t fully written yet. We don’t know much about why He is where He is. |
I tend to peice things together starting from Alma 13- the implication that the pre-existence provided choices and demonstrations of faith which are “rewarded” with being called and/or chosen on Earth. It is evident that there were divisions of spirits by their merits- “noble and great ones”- as well as some reference to divisions among “birth order”- Jesus and Lucifer being “Sons of the Morning”. I think it is therefore impossible to assume that both pre-existence and exaltation operate under egalitarian principles. Such has never been the case- though not birthright- rather by virtue, or faith exemplified by doing good. From that perspective, we can see a Christ who excelled above all others in his ability to do good and be good, and a logic would draw a similar conclusion for the Holy Ghost. Thanks for the Post, Bruce. |
# 23, Dan, do you mean that there is a heirarchy established, or would it be possible for a heirarchy to be organized according to the will of God? I get some feeling from your comment that Jesus’ role is prince in the universe and may not be so voluntary… |
nasamomdele, My understanding of Abraham 3 is that that hierarchy is natural, and not dictated. |
Agreed, I think. |
Christ was more valiant than us, all the way from the beginning. He is who He is because of the perfect choices and attitudes that he made from the beginning. Him being part of the Godhead in the preexistance was because he was like God. Not becasue he had a body like our Heavenly Father, but because of His perfect demeaner. This is the reason that He could be the Savior. From the beginning He did not faulter. |
Sam – interesting point. Since callings don’t go to the most righteous, what does that mean in this context? Hmmmm. |
Ok Bruce, since you invited speculation, I’ll offer some. Note that it is PURE speculation. First, if anyone would have pondered this, it would be Blake Ostler. If anyone has his books, they should look through them to see what he’s said. I think we can ask a question, “WHEN did Jesus Christ become part of the Godhead?” Do we know when that happened? Is there a “when” anyway, if, as it says in D&C, that all things, past, present, and future, are before God? The temporal element of progress seems to be important, and yet it also seems that time doesn’t really exist for God. But it is at least possible that Christ’s position in the Godhead wasn’t “ratified” until He performed His atonement. Anyway, in the Old Testament, there isn’t really this idea of the Godhead, but rather a Divine Council composed of many different beings. More than three. There are hints of this in the New Testament as well, like in certain translations of the first chapter of the Gospel of John, and Revelations. So far as the Holy Ghost goes, I have a pet theory about that, also not very important in the long scheme of things and certainly not something I am very attached to. But I wonder if Lucifer wasn’t slated to be the original Holy Ghost. I get this idea mainly from his name; Lucifer means “light bearer.” Isn’t that what the Holy Ghost does, really? He lost that name when he fell, and now he is Satan. So, originally, the order was, Father-Son-Lucifer. Lucifer basically wanted to move up to number two, or maybe even number one, which is what caused him to launch his rebellion. Then, when Lucifer was thrown down from heaven, accordingly to my wild, far-out speculation, the fourth in line, the Being who is now our Holy Ghost, stepped in to fill the vacancy created by Lucifer’s fall. Like I say, pure speculation. I hope Mike Huckabee isn’t reading, what would he make of THAT? |
The answer to the teacher’s question probably depends a lot on understanding how exalted beings, such as Heavenly Father, go about having spirit families. We don’t know the process by which an “intelligence” is “clothed in a spirit body”. General authorities, as recently as some of our current apostles (Elder Packer), have used the phrases “an intelligence becoming clothed in a spirit body” and thereby “becoming a spirit son or spirit daughter of God.” We assume that a spirit body is composed of spirit matter, but we don’t know what an “intelligence” is, much less what the conditions of its existence were prior to becoming “clothed in a spirit body.” We only have hints such as “intelligences are co-eternal with God”. And that spirit-matter cannot be created or destroyed. But to me, that begs the questions: where were our intelligences, and what were we doing prior to ‘becoming’ the sons and daughters of our Heavenly Father? Where/what were our intelligences before Elohim attained exaltation? Where was the spirit matter of our spirit body before it was donned by our intelligence? Prior to the clothing of the intelligence in a spirit body, was the intelligence considered a “personage?” Or is the “personage” or our pre-mortal selves a created thing that comes into being when the intelligence dons a spirit body? Perhaps this line of speculation is looking beyond the mark, because we haven’t been told, at least not told anything beyond the vague hints in the Doctrine and Covenants, and a few lines at general conference from the brethren. I’m sure it will all make sense to those who inhabit the Celestial Kingdom. |
I don’t have ready access to my stash of Mormon books at the moment. Here’s my random speculation: Agency is an eternal principle. We all had agency in the premortal life. Which means, in some way, there had to be right and wrong. Not sure if we can call it “sin,” as that connotes open, wilfull rebellion. But imagine a class of 1st or 2nd graders. Some of the kids are simply very clever, they don’t color outside the lines, their scissors cut shapes exactly, their handwriting is legible, etc. So, in this scenario, the Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost were kids in the class just like us, and our parents noticed they were really bright (along with Lucifer), and over time hierarchies emerged. So we’ve got agency. Some people use it very well and are foreordained to do great things. Others use it awfully and become Satan’s minions. The rest of us are born into this world, and the act of being born absolves us of all our _______ (don’t want to use the word sins) from the premortal life, thanks to the Atonement. This line of thinking was once used to explain why some people were born in the covenant, and others born to miserable circumstances (or were born black). Think “Master who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” So our state in this life was determined by the premortal life, just as our postmortal life will be determined by our mortal life. (Estates). But the big hole in this paradigm is that people then start to assume that where and when you’re born here is a result of past righteousness, and you jump to conclusions. “You’re Abraham’s seed…well I can make these rocks here Abraham’s seed too. Big deal.” All a long way of saying either the Savior was the same as us but simply more pure, more righteous, and advanced further than we did (in which case we were all then judged in relation to how close we came to Him in perfection prior to even being born) or He and the Holy Ghost are, in fact, of some other genus altogether. OK lunch break is over. |