9 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
ESO, I like this one. I am pretty sure that the individual personalities of the RS Pres, Bishop, and other people in leadership positions played a huge role in how the situation was treated by each individual ward. I am not sure you can point to a wards demographic/class status and determine how the ward will react to a situation. |
Leadership might have something to do with it – but it doesn’t have to be the determiner. One person can make a world of difference. I guess that’s called personal leadership. |
I read somewhere that this sort of comparison is about perspective. The worst of people are good sometimes. Perhaps your ward stepped for someone else; maybe your parents’ did not. Perhaps many in your ward had been wounded by this man, I don’t know. But I suppose they have equal shares of goodness and uh, indifference. |
I think it depends on the offense of the person in jail. I know that sounds judgmental, but I think it matters. We recently had a man commit an awful crime against another member of the ward. It caused a lot of pain and anger in the ward. I personally didn’t go visit him, and I don’t know anyone who did except maybe people in the bishopric and his own family. It was pretty devastating to the whole ward, and a lot of people just wished the offending person would move away after he got out of prison. |
The only difference I see between the two wards from how you describe it, is that in the “cold” ward, leaders gave instructions for visits to this sister in need, while in the “warm” ward, no instruction was given. If you control for the actions of the leaders, would there really be any difference between the two wards? Would the regular members have gone to visit the sister in need in the ‘cold’ ward? I bet the answer is no. |
I tend to agree with Dan that it was likely driven by the leaders. Some leader took it on as a project and drove it forward in one ward and that it likely did not happen in the other ward. |
Yep, That was what I was getting at in #1. A RS president or Bishop in the “cold ward” led the charge and a project was born. |
It was indeed a RS president in the cold ward who instigated that work, although I do not want to underplay the efforts of those who got involved. And yes–the actual crimes involved were of a different nature, perhaps the woman’s was more “acceptable,” although she had been convicted and the man merely accused. Is it OK to not serve someone because we know/believe they have done something terrible? |
I think it depends on each individual case, ESO. If I know another human being who is being denied the very basic of rights, then no, it’s not okay. Am I obligated to visit somebody in prison just because my Relief Society president takes a project on, if I don’t feel kindly toward that person? Yes. Those people make a decision when they decide to break the law to pay the price if they’re caught. Unfortunately others, innocents, often pay that price as well. I might decide to visit a friend in jail, even to take their child to visit, but it’s not my right to make that decision for others. Everybody deserves some compassion and service, but I think we should act when moved on by the spirit and allow others the same choice. |