7 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
I really like the Old Testament. I think it sets the standard for what scripture should be with its strong narrative-base and its diversity of materials and sources. In comparison, I think a scripture that lacks that narrative-base and diversity of sources (I’m thinking of the Qur’an here) really suffers. My personal definition for the scriptures is: “a sacred history of highly dysfunctional families.” |
Obviously the OT offers a lot of problems and challenges to its readers who expect more ideal behavior from people and even more so from prophets. But I think wrestling with the difficult texts is in some ways a better moral/intellectual exercise than if everything was what we would expect/hope it to be. |
Cool BY quote. I feel almost as conflicted about the OT as I feel about BY quotes. |
That’s a great quote, Ellsworth. I really appreciate your nuanced view of the OT. One nice thing about the OT is that it provides a lowest common denominator among works of scripture. If someone of another Christian sect points to something in the BoM as being weird, you know you can always trump it with something far more bizarre in the OT. |
ESO, I’ll bet Brigham Young would smile if you said his OT quote about his other quotes. |
My favorite book in the OT is “The songs of Solomon”. |
ESO, hippychick, |