Comments on: Democrats and Media Attack Palin and Hurt Obama

By: BrianJ

BrianJ — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 07:58:09 +0000

Yeah, she did a freakishly good impression too.

By: Bookslinger

Bookslinger — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:54:09 +0000

Just found out that Tina Fey _did_ play Palin on SNL tonight.

Might be the first time Tina Fey votes Republican.

By: BrianJ

BrianJ — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:13:46 +0000

Tina Fey is probably wondering how long of gig that would be.

By: Bookslinger

Bookslinger — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 05:10:27 +0000

Tina Fey needs to play Palin on SNL.

http://www.hotornotgossip.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/08/29/tinafey.jpg

Uncanny resemblence.

By: Jacob J

Jacob J — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 05:04:19 +0000

I couldn’t possibly come up with 400 more comments before Dan’s new alias surpasses me

Har!

By: queuno

queuno — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:45:20 +0000

I couldn’t possibly come up with 400 more comments before Dan’s new alias surpasses me (every time there’s a political post, Dan gets in about 6x as many).

I’ve been around the ‘nacle for awhile. But this is really the best blog (along with Keeppitchwhateverican’tspellit). Mostly because the people here are a bit more real than some of the other big blogs.

Although, I’ll read pretty much whatever Ardis posts, no matter where…

By: Tagore

Tagore — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:52:27 +0000

queuno: This is your lucky break! With Dan out of the picture, only 400+ more comments and the top commenter spot is all yours!

By: a random John

a random John — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:55:21 +0000

I’ve listened to the lipstick comment in context several times and I have to say that the worst way it could possibly be construed it that McCain and his policies are the pig and that Palin is the lipstick applied to make everyone excited about McCain and his policies.

You’d have to be ignorant of the context and fail at English comprehension to state that Palin is the pig. If she’s the pig, what is the lipstick? McCain’s old policies? It makes no sense. Except that faux outrage makes all sorts of sense when it keeps the news distracted from the economy, the wars, or policy debate.

By: DKL

DKL — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:40:50 +0000

Dan, I know you’ve been flailing around for the past several days trying to get my attention, but it’s a bit much for you to be chest thumping about how you “got to me.” Since you make me look good by defining the opposition as ignoramuses raging in impotent fury, it’s in my self interest to keep you around. But, I’m fair: I’m willing to have mercy on the many Democrats who don’t like the way you taint their position.

That said, you seem to be offering two reasons why you shouldn’t be banned. First, that you’re only a blog-commenting-terrorist to make a point, and second that you’ll behave from here on out.

Neither of those reasons are compelling. Perhaps you have been behaving in this way simply to make a point. Frankly, that is more disturbing than if you’d simply gotten carried away. Furthermore, you fail to grasp the deep chasm between your perception of how you act and other people’s perception of how you act.

Lastly, you didn’t have the discipline to stay “retired” when you finally came clean about how those who disagree with you fill you with rage and hatred. So there’s no reason to believe you now.

By: nasamomdele

nasamomdele — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:38:38 +0000

With the likes of Matt Damon and Pamela Anderson now offering insightful political commentary on Sarah Palin, I’m really confused about who to trust. Where is a Baldwin with some advice when I need it?

Matt Damon offering political expertise: that’s “absurd”. Please don’t quit your day job.

Pam Anderson: Palin can “suck it?” Well, she is authoritative on that…

An aside:

A very good article about how Dems can make sure Obama ends up winning the election.

Are you listening Dan?