8 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
You do know, don’t you, that their first morning of the first month was/is not our Jan 1? |
It probably wasn’t. I seem to recall a very interesting paper in Warfare and the Book of Mormon making an argument from times of battles for what the calendar was like. Unfortunately I’m not at home to lookup what exactly the claim was… I do recall it not mapping onto our calendar. Short of that the Hebrew new year varies relative to our year but is typically in September. (This year it was on the 29th and next year it is on the 18th) |
Of course their calendar wasn’t the Gregorian calendar. I’m not trying to argue that the Nephite calendar was the same as ours. I just wonder if Teancum was thinking that he would like to get rid of a major Nephite problem on his calendar’s version of New Year’s Eve. |
Actually I found this very interesting article on the Nephite calendar. Regarding Teancum’s motivations, I don’t know. It’s an interesting question if it was also a Lamanite significant day. It might be a bit more devastating to them. |
It’s entirely speculative as to whether Teancum was motivated by the date in the year. I would be surprised though if the timing was entirely coincidental. What Teancum did shows an unusual level of personal initiative, determination – perhaps even ruthlessness. Maybe the last day of the year, or the evening of the last day of the year, should be a time of unique and special dedication to completing some kind of important task(?). That’s the type of application I’m grasping for here. |
Didn’t Teancum try that trick one too many times? It’s going to be so cool to talk to those people in the Millennium, or afterwards, and get their stories first hand. |
Maybe we’re missing the detail that there was a ragin’ NYE party, completely with photos being taken for Facebook (Faceplates?), and that they found Amalickiah drunk… |
Ah, the old “let’s get the Lamanites drunk” trick. That worked most of the time too. |