12 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
“The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time, by Mark Haddon” I thought this was a crude and ugly book marred by the profanity and family strife that were played out in a gratuitous manner. We did read it for book club, and one of the participants brought her son who is a math savant so that was interesting, but it did not meet the cost-benefit ratio of bad:good for my taste. And LDS book clubs should be aware of the frequent use of the f-word. One of the members recommended Elizabeth Moon’s SPEED OF DARK as a book that approached the issue of autism in a kinder gentler way (without the f-word), and I did find that infinitely better (bad pun since the character is also a math whiz in that book). |
:) I was checking some books out at the library once and a lady brought “The Color Purple” back and said it was filthy pornography and should be burned. I thought it was wonderful. Different strokes for different folks. Guys, yes, there’s cussing in the book. Forgot about that. |
I’m currently in charge of our ward’s book group. It is a balancing act to find books that don’t offend too many people, but are still worth reading. It’s much easier to suggest books for my other groups. Personally, I think people should generally pre-read just about any book they suggest for a group. Not necessarily for content, but to see if it really was worth reading and discussing. I’ve sat through too many discussions where the woman who chose the book and is leading the discussion didn’t like it, or chose a book with little to talk about. But that’s just my opinion. It seems like most people want to read something new. |
You know, I’ve recommended “The Sunflower” before, but it’s worth repeating the recommendation. Wonderful, thought-provoking book about forgiveness. I think Simon Weisenthal wrote it. |
You know, I’ve recommended “The Sunflower” before, but it’s worth repeating the recommendation. Wonderful, thought-provoking book about forgiveness. I think Simon Weisenthal wrote it. |
If you want something recent, do The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold. She’s a budding Edith Wharton for the 21st century, primarily in terms of pace and style, though her male characters fail to match the depth of the female characters, and they don’t lay a finger on Wharton’s legendary male leads, but the story is quite good, the thoughts and minds of the female characters are brilliantly explored, and the writing is quite nice (which seems increasingly rare nowadays). From what I’ve heard, one should avoid the movie at all costs. If you want a classic, then (speaking of Edith Wharton) try The Age of Innocence. It is a thorough-going delight, and it does a better job portraying the complex motivations and compromises (moral, emotional, and cognitive) that collide to create the male psyche than any other novel written. Another very good classic is Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austin. It’s unfortunate that her recent resurgence in popularity has made her seem somewhat cliche, because she’s arguably the most clever crafter of novels in the English language. Of course, Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations is arguably the finest novel written. It’s certainly the most illustrative of Dickens’ easy-going, never-see-me-try economy with words and character description — what the 1st 3 paragraphs alone tell us about the protagonist has taken lesser authors (even highly acclaimed ones) scores of pages. It’s customary to prefer the 1st ending. I kind of do, but I really do like the 2nd one. |
Hopes endures by Collette Livermore was a great book I read last year. It is the autobiography of a Australian girl who joined Mother Theresa’s Order as a teen but ultimately left 20 years later to go to medical school. It opens a lot of discussion on what it means to be a Christian. Excellent book. |
I’m not sure what to think of this comment. The Curious Incident was a very interesting book, and (in the end) somewhat depressing, but I didn’t think it was at all funny. |
#7 T Stevens, I read Hope Endures. As I recall, it was a rather negative look at Mother Teresa’s order. Didn’t the author ultimately experience a crisis of faith? My memory’s shaky but that’s the impression I’m recalling. #8 BTD Greg (and Naismith), I guess I’ve got a warped sense of humor because I laughed out loud in a lot of places. I loved that kid’s spirit. The observations he made as he attempted to get to his mother just cracked me up. I laughed when I read “Running With Scissors” too. And oh, the book about Marley the dog. “Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime” didn’t strike me as a book about an autistic child. For me, it was a book about a really spunky and smart kid struggling with the fact that his father lied to him. He approaches relationships literally, without guile. The fact that he was autistic was, for me, secondary. “Hope Endures” troubled me. As I recall, many of the novitiates–is that the right word?–became very ill and struggled with the emotional demands of their missions largely unsupported. DKL, what a concept, a classic. I’ve never read any of those books. I think we read Madame Bovary. Or somewhere there was a discussion. I’m probably mixing that up. I’ve never enjoyed Jane Austen—I just have never finished a one of them. The people seem so shallow. They don’t work, they just visit. I feel very guilty about not reading Charles Dickens. Any well read person should read his books. So maybe I’ll suggest it next. As far as The Lovely Bones, I’ve skimmed through it and for me, too wrenching. I just couldn’t go there. It took me years to get the courage to read The Color Purple. I read the other book Sebold wrote but I can’t remember the plot right off. I just finished Chris Bojalians (not sure on the spelling) book, Secrets of Eden. It falls short, for me, although I love his writing. He tried to tell the story through 4 different points of view and it dilutes his subject and confuses the reader. It’s about domestic abuse, but, like I said, falls short. Frustrating, in a way. I always try to read something inspiring along with my love for fiction (I know, that’s totally ungrammatical). Every once in awhile I read something that makes my spirit soar. “Steadfast and Immoveable” by Robert Millett, “Reaching for the Invisible God, by Philip Yancey are wonderful. And you guys, no lie, Sunflower is a must-read. |
If you want something that is a contemporary classic, that is both critically and popularly acclaimed, and that would represent an off-the-wall choice for most of your participants, then read Maus, by Art Spiegelman. It’s the only comic book to ever win the Pulitzer Prize. It’s an amazing and powerful book. |
Oh, you’re right there. Maus is in a class of its own. I wonder how it would play with a group of Mormon women. Most if the women in my group are tough and smart but we have a couple of Molly Mormons who might find it objectionable. I didn’t know about the Pulitzer but it makes perfect sense. |
How about Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters by Alan Miller and Satoshi Kanazawa This book is based in evolutionary psychology, the premise that every decision we make is based on us surviving and propagating the species. With that starting point they attempt to explain all number of human behaviors with plenty of examples. If you are looking for a really good time with a psychology book, then this is absolutely the one you should get :-) As for fiction I read alot of Crime/mystery stuff. Not always a winner for a LDS centric book club. |