36 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Maybe McChrystal did it intentionally… |
I wouldn’t be surprised if he attempted to resign previously (like Rumsfeld) but was refused. I also wouldn’t be surprised if he goes off the grid and isn’t heard of for a long while because he’s back to working with special forces, which is what he came from and doubled under his watch in Afghanistan. I’d be very surprised if he was just dumb enough to make some off the cuff statements like that. No one does that. Especially not a general. We’re not talking about MacArthur levels of being irate because the all hell is breaking lose. He just went off along with his staff over an extended period for a specific reason. |
Start right there. Shut the internet off, and you will be so much more educated. |
Exactly. The right simply parades on fear. Scare Americans to death and the right wins. How pathetic… |
@Daniel – Drudge is sort the right-wing version of Greenwald and Salon. |
queuno, I’d love for drudge to be a right-wing version of Greewald and Salon; you know, where commentary is done. But that’s not Drudge. There is no comparable example on the left of Drudge, except like TMZ type sites. But those are apolitical. Drudge rules on filth. He succeeds on gossip. And I think we all remember our MormonAd warning us about gossip… ;) |
Not in my house. I still think we should have just made a parking lot of Afghanistan. Seriously? The Russians couldn’t do it. What makes you think we could? |
Because the left doesn’t use fear tactics at all either…*yawn* |
nope, the left uses tactics of happiness and love. :) |
I didn’t know the general had tried to resign. How come he couldn’t? Daniel, do you have an alternate site? I’ve checked out other sites and I think Drudge is pretty even handed for a conservative. He doesn’t try to pretend he’s anything but what he is. I don’t think anybody could defeat Afganistan on the ground. I don’t believe it can be defeated because the people have a pretty indomitable spirit. Well the men anyway, the women barely exist. I’d have bombed them to smithereens and not attempted a ground war. I think I’d have also bombed that area in Pakistan where the Taliban is supposed to be hiding. I realize it might not have gotten them in the caves but it would have taken the “war” where they lived. I would have made it non-stop—I’m talking years. And then set up American bases as a place for planes and drones to take off. Made it an air war. Unforgiving, unflinching. No hearts and minds. Just put the fear in. Use the place to test superbombs and underground nuclear weapons. Well that’s one idea. I wouldn’t have put troops on the ground. Just bombed and bombed and bombed. |
Oh I didn’t say he did… I mean I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out he did. Rumsfeld tried a few times and wasn’t accepted by Bush. The General might have wanted to return to Specops or he could have just saw where the war was going, how the deck was being stacked against him (as he might have seen it, no idea about reality) by the State Department, or just felt like the war was unwinnable and didn’t want his name attached to it. |
And bombing bombing bombing like that would demonstrate you’re no better than Osama. I really don’t think that’s your position, but you should re-consider spouting out like that simply because it shows a blatant disregard for the hundreds of thousands or millions of people born there who want nothing to do with this war. What a terrible thing to expound on as though the world should be made over how we like just because we have the biggest bombs. And I’m hard core pro military. But you have to know what the military stands for and it’s not murderous tyranny. |
arlene,
I thought you weren’t a conservative? I look at it right now (a slow news Saturday), and right now it is fairly benign. If you want a non-biased, comprehensive news source, check out Google News.
This would not have worked (as it did not work for the Russians in the 80s either). Nor did this work for us in Vietnam. Do you realize how many bombs we dropped over Vietnam, and yet we still lost that war? Let’s just put our enemy in perspective. The Taliban shares ethnic brotherhood with about 45 million people. 45 MILLION people. We have to face the reality that a political compromise will eventually have to be reached with the Taliban. We could have defeated the Taliban if a certain previous president did not take his eye off the ball and focus on Iraq. But we cannot cry over spilled milk anymore. Arlene, this is why I advise you to get away from conservative propaganda….er I mean news sources. They’re feeding you a bunch of lies, and destroying your humanity and morals. These guys from Fox and Drudge are drunk on stupidity, Arlene. Avoid them for your own good, and for the good of America. |
If I read someone like Drudge, I hope I would have the good sense not to brag about it. |
Well you can just bite me. Although I wasn’t bragging, I was telling. I’m sure as hell not ashamed ot it. I know what it sounds like and my emotions war against the knowledge of the poor ignorant—mostly women and children—innocents of Afganistan. What would you have done after 9/11 oh enlightned ones? Daniel I’m kind of a conservative and kind of a liberal. D’Nesh d souza writes of the war against Islamic extremism that we can only win by anhilation. If I spelled that right. He makes sense to me. |
No comment on that sex poodle, Al Gore? Maybe that was only on Drudge. |
Arlene, It’s Dinesh D’Souza. You were close. Sadly, he does not know what he is talking about. I don’t know why he would make sense to you. He blames liberals for 9/11. Don’t be a fool to listen to this idiot, Arlene. He’s drunk his right-wing kool aid and cannot see reality. He’s projecting a perverted corrupted form of conservatism that will destroy your morality. I’ve commented right here on Mormon Mentality before on what I would have done after 9/11. Long long ago. I would have transformed Afghanistan back when conditions were right for us to transform Afghanistan. That window of opportunity has been closed, possibly forever. We are faced with a future where the Taliban will still exist, and ironically, stronger than they were before 9/11. That’s just pathetic. And the problem is because of George W Bush, who decided America’s security was better served by going into Iraq. What a stupid idiot. Arlene, you cannot annihilate your enemies anymore in this world without killing tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people. Over the past 100 years, the population of the world has exploded dramatically. Are you really willing to kill tens and hundreds of millions of people, Arlene? Is that the kind of person you wish to be remembered by your children? Especially when, if you were to believe the likes of Dinesh D’Souza, that would require also killing Americans? Because let me tell you, the likes of Dinesh D’Souza would have no problem killing American liberals if certain aspects of our society were not in their way to block them from doing so. If we were a more militaristic society, American liberals would be killed by the likes of Dinesh D’Souza. Is that really the kind of world you want to live in? |
I don’t think he’s an idiot. I think he makes a lot of sense. You have failed to convince me. I bought his book. |
nope, the left uses tactics of happiness and love. :) Didn’t you just cite a Mormonad? I’ll see yours, and raise you the one about the onion masquerading as a carmel apple… |
arlene, I never expected to convince you. You’re a true conservative. It’s sad to see that you agree with him that liberals are to be blamed for 9/11. |
Oh pshaw Daniel, I don’t even remember that, if I ever knew it. I just remember his book “What’s So Great About America?” I think you’re putting your own liberal slant to that. What I remember about it what he said about the psyches of those who promote terrorism. Which is my point about Afganistan. Honestly, Daniel, what do you think should have been our country’s reaction to 9/11? What should have been our course of action? What would you have done? |
LOL @ happiness and love… Man I really can’t say what I want to say on these blogs…. |
Arlene, Of course you don’t remember that. You don’t actually want to be associated with a man who blames Americans for 9/11, but that’s exactly what Dinesh D’Souza does. Here, read for yourself
Do you really believe that, Arlene? He’s taken the position of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, who said this just after 9/11:
Do you really believe that, Arlene? How does he know what the psyche of a terrorist is like? Is he a terrorist? He does, after all, blame innocent people for the crime of the century. That sounds like a terrorist to me. Maybe he does know what a terrorist thinks like because he IS a terrorist. Or maybe he’s just plain stupid and does not know a single thing about what he’s talking about. What would I have done after 9/11? I would have done a Marshall Plan in Afghanistan. I would never have sent the Northern Alliance against Al-Qaeda, but would have had our soldiers go in there themselves. Cut off any escape for Bin Laden (as he apparently escaped toward Pakistan from Tora Bora). I would have pumped money into the system right away, had an American control the country for a while and slowly reset the country to what it used to be. Afghanistan actually had a fairly progressive life as late as the 1960s. It was actually a decent place. Then the Soviets showed up and truly destroyed the country. I would never have thought that our forces could handle two major wars at the same time, thus withdrawing forces from the true fight against our true enemy, into a fight against a caged enemy: Iraq. But then, I’m not the son of a man who was nearly assassinated by the leader of the caged enemy. I didn’t have daddy issues. The point of focusing all efforts on Afghanistan would have been to show the Muslim world that Americans were not in a war against Islam. That our purpose was to benefit Muslim societies, not destroy them. If we are to follow the musings of the Indian terrorist, Dinesh D’Souza, we ought to be actively engaged in destroying the corrupt religion, Islam. Either we show the Muslim world that we are a peaceful nation, or we show them that we are an enemy. If we show them we are an enemy, we will never be at peace. If we show them we are peaceful, there is a far greater chance of actually living in a peaceful world. I don’t know about you, Arlene, but I prefer to live in a world where bad things occasionally happen because people make bad choices, but that we’re a humanity that generally tries to live in peace with each other, no matter how much we may hate each others’ guts. Should I take up my arms and go kill Dinesh D’Souza for essentially putting the blame of 9/11 on a guy like me? He’s siding me with the enemy, and I’m supposed to kill the enemy: if I were living under conservative ideology. Is that really the point of this life? At what point, Arlene, are you willing to tolerate living in a world where your enemies will also be living? Are you willing to have your taxes raised so that your endless war can be paid for? Because to this point, STILL, neither the war in Iraq, nor the war in Afghanistan, have been paid for by actual funds. Are you not ashamed at this? These two wars, are yet to be paid for. We’ve been borrowing money from the Chinese in order to kill Muslims. At some point, we’re going to have to pay the Chinese back. That’s over $1 trillion dollars now. When are you willing to sacrifice your money in order for your war to be paid for? Or are you going to stand with those who send this bill to their children? Can you see why I have such disdain for today’s conservatives? Y’all don’t think this through very well. |
my comment is in moderation |
I’ve written articles that blamed liberals for 9/11, Dan. Just like I blame J. Earl Carter for the hostage crisis. It’s not that big of a deal to point to the foreign policy outlook of liberals and show that they lead to a weakening of the US and an emboldening of its enemies, because they actually do. Furthermore, the intellectual pedigree of the notion that policies like the ones that you advocate will lead to the destruction of the US is quite distinguished. But, as usual, you’re arguing about the inconsequential, because you think it will allow you to score a rhetorical point on behalf of the ideology that you so tiresomely cheerlead for. |
They actually don’t, DKL. But you’re a core believer. There’s never a chance you could see otherwise. You will constantly project your lies upon those you disagree with. Reality is another matter. Surely terrorists were not emboldened by Reagan cutting and running in 1983. Surely they were not emboldened when Reagan sold them weapons. In the end, Osama Bin Laden loves George W Bush far more than he does Barack Obama, because Osama Bin Laden knows that a guy like George W Bush (and therefore, a guy like you, DKL) will cause America to attack Muslims, falling right into the rhetorical hands of none other than guys like Osama Bin Laden. Speaking of Osama, you know who else agrees with you, DKL, that America’s liberals are enemies? Yeah, Osama Bin Laden. You side with him, DKL. In the end, you are in his camp. You always were. You always will be. |
Afganistan was never a decent place, Daniel. You’re out to lunch. Sun: you can almost say anything you want here. Knock yourself out. |
Arlene, I told you to stop listening to conservatives. They are lying to you. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/05/27/once_upon_a_time_in_afghanistan?page=full That’s Afghanistan in the 1950s… |
The funniest part of that article, Daniel, is that the author left Afghanistan in 1968 to study in the west and pursue a career and never looked back — so much so that he even forgot about his book of photos that believes have a profound enough import to write an entire article about. Apparently, the irony of this is lost on the author, who appears completely in earnest. It’s also funny to hear liberals, who are convinced that the US was a very nasty place in the 1950s, talk about Afghanistan in the 1950s as though it were an oasis in the wasteland of failed states between India and Turkey. And if you ever hear anyone even try to imply that Iran was better off in the 1950s than it is now, liberals will go positively ape-sh*t over the fact that back then the CIA propped up the Iranian government. But yeah, Afghanistan. In the 1950s, that was the destination of choice for people in the know. |
What’s so funny about that DKL? A man leaving a decent place to study in a better place, finds a good job and a good life. Sounds like a normal incident to me. Did he foresee that Afghanistan would become the hellhole it is today? I doubt anyone could. No irony here, DKL. Though I am pleasantly surprised that it seems you were caught off guard over how well Afghanistan used to look that you would attack an article like this so viciously. I think it was Kurt at Bloggernacle Times who noted that when cornered with damning evidence, you return fire by attacking the character. Honestly I don’t know what argument you’re making here. You’re shooting wildly at your usual targets and forgetting reality. You’re saying that you think it is funny to hear liberals convinced that the US was a nasty place in the 1950s. Which liberals were convinced the US was a nasty place in the 1950s? I’m the only liberal talking here. I never said the US was a nasty place in the 1950s. Maybe you’re talking about your invisible liberal friend Bob. Which liberal said Afghanistan was an oasis in the wasteland of failed states between India and Turkey? Furthermore, I don’t recall India or Turkey being considered failed states in the 1950s, nor Pakistan, Iran, or Iraq. And Iran, in the 1950s, well, it once was a democratically elected government before the CIA toppled it and replaced with an oppressive shah. But that’s, again, neither here nor there. My only note on Afghanistan was this:
Based on actual facts, my comment was not far off at all. Your comments, however, are nowhere near reality. Go back to shooting birds with your friend Dick Cheney, and make sure to get him drunk. |
#24 your comment was in moderation… that’s funny… don’t you just delete peoples comments on your blog when they prove you wrong? |
I was thinking about the Afganistan of the 1700′s and 1800′s. If Afganistan had a civilized–or halfway so–in the 1950′s that was a brief bright spot in its history. Yeah some rabid Republican got me interested in 19th century Afganistan. Geez, Dan, I can read. |
Arlene, What would you expect of Afghanistan in the 19th century? How many regions of the world were developed and modernized back then? The US was barely beginning its industrialization. The British Empire had industrialized, but they did not export that industrialism to their colonies, or the territories they were attempting to colonize (like Afghanistan). Afghanistan was relatively peaceful throughout the mid-20th century, which allowed for great development, as you can see in those pictures. What ended up killing that was their location: sandwiched between the Soviet Union and India. Bad spot to be in. So yeah, don’t listen to rabid Republicans. They are liars. |
[...] Mormon Mentality – Thoughts and Asides by Peculiar People … [...] |
I’m so glad to see the unintentionally hilarious Daniel I know. I’m grinning ear to ear. Annegb- funny how you think Al is one of the most unattractive men alive and how you wonder how Tipper ever ended up with him. Remember when she suffered the most awkward political convention kiss of all time in the 2000 Dem Convention? Priceless. Drudge is excellent. WSJ, Drudge, RCP, HuffPo are generally good. HuffPo requires the most filtering of language and rants. |
anyways I had an opinion on McChrystal, (anybody actually read the Rolling Stone piece anyways?) I was in Iraq when he was in charge of SOCOM and that guy is pretty good at counter insurgency stuff… He’s a pretty straight shooter too, outspoken… my take on it is if McChrystal had that much of a problem with certain people in the Obama administration, then yeah there was a problem… If I had to deal with the pantywaist civilian politician types at that level no doubt I’d have a few choice words myself… |