78 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Good for them. It gives them a chance to get away from ugly denim skirts, stupid lace collars, big hairdos, and the general dowdiness of their wives to enjoy some nice eye candy. |
They are looking at porn at home & work so what the heck! I hope their daughters get implants and jobs at hooters! |
They must have lousy taste … buds. |
ed42, That’s a good one. I used to live right up the street from the original Hooters in Clearwater FL. The food has never been the attraction to that restaurant. |
“They go for the obvious reasons” The obvious reason being that each is a closeted homosexual given to clumsy efforts at misdirection by overly obvious affirmation of heterosexual interests. |
Except, of course, Hooters doesn’t have any different wait staff than any other chain restaurant. The only reason to go is if you are desperate for something to use to annoy others. Which might be why they are going there. Oh, and if you get lost on New Years Eve, they usually have police officers at the local Hooters so you can stop and ask them for directions and help (which I learned from my daughter). If there is another reason, I wouldn’t know it, but perhaps you would get better advice or comments from someone who has actually been to one. |
I’ve never been to hooters, but I saw a show about it on Undercover Boss, and from what I can tell, there’s no particular reason why LDS guys should be censured for going there. It’s just another restaurant, it’s not like the waitresses are topless or anything. To me, there’s no “obvious reason” to go there, unless you really, really like their wings or something. |
Stupid, stupid boys. |
There’s no excuse for a group of Mormon guys to go to Hooters. Of course, there’s no excuse for them to go to TGIFridays, Appleby’s, Olive Garden, or any other chain restaurant, either. They should certainly be censured for poor taste and for not supporting local, independent, high-quality restaurants. |
We have to consider the possibility that these men are merely clueless owl aficionados :) |
Never been to Hooters. Seen the ads, though, and if their waitresses really are just like everybody else, then that’s false advertising. |
I really like the way Sam B. put it. |
Yeah, me, too. |
My mother in law was on vacation in another country with a member of the relief society general presidency who shall remain nameless but you would all recognize her by name. They asked a local where they should eat near their hotel. Trying to be helpful this person asked what sort of food they wanted to eat. “Chicken.”. They soon found themselves at Hooters having no idea for what it was. They had their food before they figured it out. They then ate as quickly as they could and left in shame. |
It’s just a waste. If you want great food and want to ogle in DFW, go to Bone Daddy’s. The food is *SO MUCH* better, and the waitresses are trashier, “Hooters-minor-league” types. (I eat on the patio when I go there, because the waitresses ignore you.) |
My question is, is this outing announced in Priesthood opening exercises, or billed as Manrichment? If not, then it does seem in bad taste, but it’s probably no worse than Superbowl parties or any other “gray area” private get-together…? |
Sounds like kind of a stupid assertion of their masculinity. I find those suspicious and juvenile. That’s about all I’ve got. |
Mind your own business. Don’t broadcast the misgivings of others or assume what their misdeeds are, which is between them, the Lord, and to whatever extent is necessary, their church leaders. Worst case, hopefully, one day they’ll know better and realize it’s not just that we should act prudish but that we should respect all God’s children for their innate worth and avoid contributing to their objectification. |
Probably better than a bunch of sisters getting together to go ogle Taylor Lautner in the latest Twilight movie… |
How ridiculous. There are plenty of women to ogle in Church–why in the world would one pay for bad fried chicken in order to get the associated eye candy? (Yes, I’m joking. About 85% joking, anyway.) |
Here is my take on this. I think its maybe equal to watching rated R movies. Its not any way related to any church activities as Jeans asked. Nor are their wives unattractive. For adult married LDS males its pretty immature but really not much different then getting together and oogling the Twilight cast. I wanted to see what the wisdom of the bloggernacle had to say about this |
Jota G FTW! |
I know that this isn’t what you’re looking for, bbell, but like queuno was saying, the real tragedy here is that there are so many better places to get a burger in DFW. St. Pete’s Dancing Marlin/Angry Dog in Deep Ellum is still the best burger I’ve ever had, and Lucky’s Cafe in Oak Lawn is pretty good too. Of course, if the wait staff is what you’re looking for, the waitresses at St. Pete’s will largely ignore you and the wait staff at Lucky’s are almost entirely gay men. I moved back home (Boise) a couple of years ago, and the fantastic independent restaurants are close to the top of my list of things I miss about DFW. |
LOL! I love the equality comments! Especially when they give balance to a biased suspiciously selfrighteous comment that propagates a demeaning stereotype. “…really not much different then getting together and oogling the Twilight cast.” “Probably better than a bunch of sisters getting together to go ogle Taylor Lautner in the latest Twilight movie…” LOL LOL LOL… so true. But at the end of the day, I think I am with Sam B (#9). Never been to Hooters, but I love chicken wings. Anyone know if they are any good? |
jimbob – While Dancing Marlin is good, I actually prefer State and Allen’s burgers. There are a ton of other excellent options – Twisted Root (try the fried pickles) and TABC have pretty great burgers too. |
I’ve never been to Hooters so I can’t comment on their food. I would go if the food were worth the harassment I might get from my wife, but nobody has ever made that case. If a bunch of guys want to get together and go to Hooters so that they feel “rebellious,” and see waitresses dressed in more clothes than the women at their local neighborhood pool, who cares? On the grand scale of things, I think this is pretty harmless. They should keep it to themselves, however. “Bragging” about going to Hooters is pretty dweebish. I ate a a fancy French restaurant near SLC once. The waitresses wore 19th century french outfits with low necklines but the food was excellent. Well worth putting my soul at risk from the view. |
I liked Hooters food. But that was a long time ago. Although I was bothered when everything I said to our waitress was taken for an innuendo. The twilight comment was spot on. |
Getting together to go to Hooters – completely unacceptable. Just a few small steps away from going to a topless bar. Besides, why even get close to the line of propriety? If you want a “guys’ night out” go to Applebee’s. If you want to step close to the line of infidelity, then go to Hooters. Is this situation true? If so, then it makes me sick. |
Really Angie, it makes you “sick?” Again, I’ve never patronized the restaurant, but that seems a bit over the top. |
Infidelity Angie? Really? More like passing around a Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue while eating. |
#1 was pretty funny…. #28 Get off it… the waitresses at Hooters aren’t prostitutes… 99.9 percent probably have no interest in the average Hooters customer “crossing the line of infidelity” as for these fellas, if their intent is to “cross the line of infidelity” their chances of setting that in motion at Hooters are most likely the same if not less than any other place you can think of. |
Sorry, but the comparison with the Twilight movies is a stretch (not that I’m a fan). I doubt many women watch just to “ogle” the cast; they go for the romantic story and the emotional connection. Sure, some find the actors really attractive, but the same could be said of nearly any popular romantic movie. Hooters is all about breasts, people. It’s the name of the restaurant, for crying out loud. Waitresses are hired specifically for their breast size. The whole point is to ogle. If y’all think it’s no big deal for LDS men to support a restaurant that profits by objectifying women, well–I hardly know what to say to that. |
Oh, Rivkah, you are a comic genius! |
Angie, Angie, Angie, |
Rivka (32) – You said: “I doubt many women watch just to “ogle” the cast; they go for the romantic story and the emotional connection.” I watched the movie with my wife. The theater was full of adult women (many members of the church). When “Jacob” first entered without his shirt, there was an audible, collective inhalation of breath. Then a nervous chuckle because the the noise that had been made. Yes, it’s just anecdotal, but I don’t think that experience was unique. |
Angie has a point. My concern would be more about the alcohol than the boobs, however. Because first and foremost Hooters is a bar. How would you guys feel if your wife and 4 of her friends went to a bar regularly? It’s not right. No matter what religion you are. Even if all you’re doing is eating, watching the game and having a good time, the atmosphere isn’t one that is conducive to the spirit and you all know it. Change to situation to a bunch of women and let’s see how good you feel about it. |
Because sooner or later human nature says A. Somebody is going to have a beer (I coudn’t resist) and B. Somebody’s going to grab a boob that doesn’t belong to his wife. |
Arlene, I understand that Hooters is more of a restaurant with a bar than it is a bar with a restaurant. To say you shouldn’t go to Hooters because they serve alcohol is to say that you shouldn’t got to any number of chain restaurants (outside of Utah) that have bars – Red Robin, Chili’s, Applebee’s, Don Pablo’s, On the Border, etc. I have been in a lot of restaurants with attractive waitresses and I have never grabbed a boob. If the dilemma had been – “A bunch of guys get together to go to Hooters to grab boobs that don’t belong to their wives” I would have said it was wrong. But if the greatest “sin” these guys make is to go to a restaurant where well endowed women who are fully clothed (albeit in form fitting clothes) serve them food on plates at tables just like at any other restaurant, they’re probably better off than a lot of people. Do I patronize Hooters? No. Would I encourage others to patronize Hooters? No. Would I dissuade any group of which I am a part from patronizing Hooters? Yes. But am I going to condemn other brethren eat there? No. There are too many beams in my eye to address their splinters. |
Ann, Alchohol is served at almost every eating place outside of fast food places in most of the country. Everytime my wife goes out with her friends they go to a place that serves alchohol. They are not about to have a beer. I would personally not eat at Hooters. I agree with many of the comments about objectifying women. |
Is Hooters any more objectifying than pageants or cheerleaders? If they have to avoid Hooters, must LDS men also avoid sporting events? |
Jota, yeah, right. |
I have never been there, but I have bought their wing sauce from the grocery store and boy-oh-boy that is good stuff. If someone says they go there only for the wings, I might be a tad skeptical, but I otherwise would believe them. The wings are that good. I know a group of active, temple-worthy LDS men that regularly visit there with their wives. I’m pretty sure there’s no ogling going on with their eternal companions by their side. |
Rivkah (32) “Sorry, but the comparison with the Twilight movies is a stretch (not that I’m a fan). I doubt many women watch just to “ogle” the cast; they go for the romantic story and the emotional connection. Sure, some find the actors really attractive, but the same could be said of nearly any popular romantic movie.” LOL! What a big pile of BS hypocritical double standard. A movie that uses as its main marketing hook shirtless teens and sexual tension (and they sure know how to exploit that line of marketing as much as they can)… “romantic story emotional connection” BS BS BS… Yeah, they are a bunch of horny women (lds, married and single) that love the movie’s sexual tension and use it to safely ogle shirtless teenage guys, that’s more like it. I guess this proves that everyone can rationalize and justify their need for sexual fantasies. Everyone knows it, it has been discussed several times elswhere in the nacle, your denial is totally out of place. Gosh am I sick of hypocrite LDS women and their fallacious double standards… jjohnsen (30) I wish it was like a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. Hooters would be a much more successful chain. |
Manuel, yeah right. |
The Twilight thing is kind of going off-topic, but since we’re talking about it…. Imagine for a moment the tables were turned: A movie comes out that features a young (age 16-18) female celebrity (Miley Cyrus, perhaps?) who spends 75% of the film in a bikini. The film is popular among men ranging in age from 20-50, especially LDS men with wives and kids, who see the film in theaters, and tend to do so in groups, while they swoon over the young star on screen Doesn’t sound so innocent anymore, does it? Double-standard indeed. |
“Hooters is all about breasts, people. It’s the name of the restaurant, for crying out loud. Waitresses are hired specifically for their breast size. The whole point is to ogle. If y’all think it’s no big deal for LDS men to support a restaurant that profits by objectifying women, well–I hardly know what to say to that.” Exactly. And the definition of “infidelity” is to be unfaithful to your spouse… regular trips to Hooters is all about looking at other women’s breasts. It’s not a sport (cheerleading, beach volleyball) or art (Michaelangelo, Renoir) or science (gross anatomy). If a married man is purposely and regularly putting himself in a situation where he will be sitting close to and looking at other women’s half-naked bodies for no other reason than that the women are half-naked, then he is cheating on his wife. I can’t believe I had to spell that out for some of you… |
Angie, The waitresses at Hooters aren’t half naked. Only their appendages are unclothed – they’re maybe only a quarter naked. Certainly more clothed than any “modest” woman’s bathing suit and more clothed than most professional cheerleaders. If one is worried about a husband’s fidelity because he eats dinner with his friends at Hooters there are some bigger issues to deal with, and the issues probably aren’t the husband’s. |
While I agree with Angie that going to Hooters is in bad taste for LDS men I do not agree that it is actually cheating. Cheating to me involves sexual/emotional intimacy with somebody other then your spouse. I disagree with Jota to an extent also. I think if an LDS man is a “regular Hooters guy” he is more likely to be into porn and more likely to be open to cheating. The mindset that would involve regular visits to Hooters shows a willingness to walk a line regarding the potential for chastity issues. I also tend to agree with Adam. There is a huge double standard in the LDS community regarding what is acceptable behavior. Twilight being the perfect example of the double standard. I think I detect a bbell post coming up. |
bbell, Just to be clear – I don’t think patronizing Hooters is in good taste and I don’t advocate it. The guys acting in your scenario are definitely acting in bad taste. But their bad taste wouldn’t justify an intrusion by a 3rd party with better taste (i.e., higher standards), an intervention by loved ones or involvement by ecclesiastical leaders. But I’ve never seen evidence of a causal link between an LDS man eating at Hooters and (1) infidelity, (2) alcoholism or, as has now been suggested, (3) porn addiction. |
“Waitresses are hired specifically for their breast size.” I don’t think so. The waitresses I saw on the TV show were not all well endowed. I think they just try to hire attractive women, and their waitress outfits are just small shorts and small t-shirts. Doesn’t seem too threatening to me. Certainly nothing to get worked up over. |
Men going to Hooters are there to dabble in being safely naughty. |
JM “safely naughty” is a good way to put it. |
If you really want to avoid even the appearance of evil, just about everything mentioned in this thread should be shunned. Lots of sit down restaurants hire attractive women (could create chastity issues) and feature mostly unhealthy dishes and plenty of alcohol(violating the word of wisdom). Just about all feature films these days have questionable content we should avoid. We really shouldn’t make visits to the beach or pool because we all know we will see people dressed immodestly. Make any of these choices, and it will only be a matter of time before you are ogling Hooters waitresses or worse – Taylor Lautner. |
ah the Talibanization of America… |
Don’t be so dramatic Daniel. No one said Hooters should be banned, just that going to Hooters is probably infantile and in bad taste. Big difference. |
The word infidelity has been thrown around a lot in this discussion, mostly by women. My question to you all is whether the kind of gossiping and griping about husbands that routinely goes on at officially sponsored Relief Society “stitch and bitch” sessions is better or worse than a man going to Hooters for some hot wings. |
Mark Brown. Stay tuned. I have a post coming up that covers that topic. Its much worse then complaining sessions. Big time double standard Daniel. Get a grip. |
Well, Mark, your wife and her friends could probably have fun at Hooter’s too. Good food good friends. Ya think? |
RS Stitch and Bitch?!? I’ve never been to one of those. Of course, I have always had spotty attendance at RS activities because they aren’t Stitch and Bitch and I get bored. I anxiously await bbell #57′s post on the S/B RS meeting. Without knowing anything about it, my first comment regarding it is the same as #57′s recommendation to Daniel – Get a Grip. |
Applebee’s can be just as bad temptation for some people as Hooters. Applebee’s restaurants are centered around a bar. You can’t sit anywhere in the restaurant and not see the bar with just a turn of the head. Alcohol and alcoholism is just as much a problem for many people as adultery/fornication. For those of you who’ve never been alcoholics, you probably won’t get what I’m talking about. But anyone who has suffered, struggled with, and overcome substance abuse can understand why you don’t want to be in places, or around things or people that bring that addiction lifestyle (or memories of your own past lifestyle) into view. Has anyone noticed that most grocery stores have moved beer and wine (and sometimes hard liquor) out of the liquor aisle and are putting them on aisle end-caps and throughout the other high traffice aisles in grocery stores? Kroger puts them opposite the meat and produce section now. You can’t shop for the basic nutrition without being exposed. Again, you’re going to say “It doesn’t bother me. I don’t have that problem.” But think of the subliminal connections it is making on your children. They are being shown that alcohol goes right with meat, fruit, and vegetables. I suppose there are people who can go to Hooters and keep a pure mind and heart, just like there are many who can go to restaurants with a prominent bar, and not be affected by the display and consumption of lots of liquor. But I’m not in either of those camps. Both of those situations remind me of a past destructive lifestyle. |
“As my dear husband put it, ‘if Hooters is just a restaurant about owls, maybe I will open a restaurant and call it Peckers. What? It’s about woodpeckers.’” Actually, there’s a “legitimate” restaurant near the Hooters bbell is describing called “Twin Peaks.” It is about exactly what you might think it would be about if you though like a 15-year-old boy. It’s like Hooters, but slightly less subtle, if that’s possible. |
Or, you know, so I’ve heard… |
St. Lucia has twin peaks called ” Les Mamelles” roughly translated “the teats” and not in the cow sense. from the air they are unmistakable and not just to 15-year-old-boys. |
There is a Twin Peaks near where I live. It’s next to the Panda Express. It smells really good from the outside, but have no personal experience with the food or the “views.” |
All of you MEN who are saying it’s perfectly fine to hang out at Hooter’s are full of crap. Crap, I say. I know it, you know it, the whole world knows it. What would Jesus do? He would so not be hanging out at Hooter’s. Unless he was converting everyone to the golden rule. You suck. All of you. Crap. Just total unmitigated crap. crap. |
annegb, Jesus would also not be calling other people crap. |
Well, I didn’t say I didn’t suck. |
What is missing in the discussion is a comment about what Hooters is actually selling. Passable wings can be had from the deli counter in Walmart for much less and boobs are free on the internet, men go to Hooters for unqualified, positive female attention. Hooters girls flirt for tips and the customers get what they pay for. I would guess that in many cases a Mormon husband’s willingness to go to Hooters probably directly related to the harpy-ness of that man’s wife. |
Ann, Who on this thread besides maybe comment number 1 thinks its OK to hang out at Hooters? |
@68 MAC – or the jerkiness of the husbands, no matter the outward appearance they show at church. |
annegb (65) That is why the Eclipse threadjack got generated. Yes, men do have weaknesses and tend to justify them; but in a greater context, women do too and they definitely tend to justify theirs just as well (perhaps better?). Both franchises show there is a great market (even among both male and female LDS members) to satisfy these weaknesses. Therefore, if men are full of crap, so are women. Because I also don’t believe (going back to the threadjack) that Jesus would be going to a movie that exploits teen sexual tension and he wouldn’t be gasping and giggling at the sight of the unclothed beautiful body of a young woman. |
Iguacufalls, I don’t disagree. I am just saying, right or wrong, that it is a lot easier to be a jerk to your wife if she is being a jerk to you. |
An awful lot of unwarranted assumptions being thrown around here. |
Arlene, I didn’t say it was fine to hang out at Hooters, I said it was in bad taste, but along the range of naughty things one might do, this is pretty benign. |
“along the range of naughty things one might do, this is pretty benign.” Ya think? |
I think it’s OK to hang out at Hooters and my wife said she doesn’t mind because the waitresses at Hooters probably aren’t into guys with long hair and beards that look like Jesus (or maybe Charles Manson) |
74 sums it up pretty well, to me at least. I’ve been to Hooters twice: both for extended lunches to watch opening rounds of March Madness. Unless the waitresses were wearing my bracket selections, I wasn’t paying attention which means I wasn’t paying attention. So, yes in addition to patronizing a Hooters, I was also gambling and, to complete the trifecta, I drank a couple of cokes. I didn’t select Hooters, but was just part of a group of lawyers looking for a place to watch some college hoops. I do recall Chipper Jones got into some serious trouble with a Hooters waitress some years back. Recently I took my family to Dirty Dick’s Crab House on the Outer Banks-Nags Head I believe. We passed a Hooters on our way to Dirty Dick’s. |
“We passed a Hooters on our way to Dirty Dick’s.” Don’t you always? |