50 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
You’ll be shocked to know just how much one can get away with in the latest of garment cuts. I have one where the sleeves are pretty nonexistent thanks to the fabric folding in on itself. Just so happens to be the same top where I could wear a low-cut if I really wanted to. Oh, and since the bottom likes to curl in, I guess some stomach bearing is ok too. But I’m pretty sure I’m buying my tops a size too small… |
I just bought some of the newer more fitting tops (Carinessa, maybe?) and I think I could pull it off under that dress with nothing showing, especially if the top were a size smaller. |
Yeah, totally wearable with the new snug tops. I don’t see anything wrong with a nude lining either, if that’s what she did. We’re supposed to wear the g’s under the guidance of our conscious. We’ve strayed too far into the territory of jot and tittle orthodox rules, imho. |
Nothing wrong with beige lining, if that is what it is. If she had stuff “added on” she of course took garments into account. I don’t want to pounce on you, but I feel sorry for women these days. Everyone is so nitpicky about every little thing they wear. Couldn’t you have asked one close friend about it, rather than start the entire internet world talking about it? I remember when I was a teenage girl and so ultra self-conscious. I now like to think that I am not, because surely, surely my entire community that sees me isn’t judging every minor wardrobe decision…..are they? |
Ok, sorry, I reread your post. On second reading it seems more like you really want to know the secret of how to turn a wedding dress into a temple wedding dress. Yeah, it is pretty simple. You just add material. I had it done to mine. I’ve added material to other dresses. It does make it easier sometimes if you don’t try to add the exact same material, but add something contrasting so it looks like it is supposed to be added (I’ve made pants longer using this idea a couple of times). Lace I imagine is a good way to do that for a wedding dress. |
Jks – From your lips to God’s ear. But not gonna happen. I carry the checkbook. |
I’m confused by your question the more I think about it having seen the dress. Maybe the LDS Church has gotten too cozy with women’s wear, I don’t know. Seeing what my wife gets, the shape of the sleeves (if you can call it that) are pretty small. Its more of a tank top style and would easily fit into what Elizabeth has for the dress. |
Apparently I am wearing the wrong size garment tops. Mine fall over my shoulders in definite cap sleeves. After reading these posts, I think I need to order smaller so I don’t have sleeves either.I am missing out on some seriously cute clothes. |
The pictures in People magazine show sleeves on her dress. I’m not sure what picture you’re talking about. |
Her dress looks totally modest to me. I feel sorry for her that she had to plan her wedding under those circumstances. Sarah had dresses with sleeves for both her weddings, bought them in Utah—there are buttloads of them here! Off subject, but those people deserved the death penalty. |
You know, LIZ, the really sad reality is that due to what happened to her, she’s become a celebrity. We’re human….it’s normal to think about these things. |
I’m talking about that the sleeves are see through lace and the bodice has shoulder straps, not solid fabric sleeves. I just couldn’t figure how you could wear a garment top without a proper fabric cap over the shoulder. |
Oh that happens all the time here. No one bats an eye. I have a couple outfits like that! Your garments show through the sheer fabric. I do think garments are changing a bit because I just bought Bill new garments and they’re pretty much made like regular T-Shirts. I think it looks nicer than the other garments. We have two beautiful wedding dresses with sleeves (not sheer :)). What size is your daughter? |
I am under strict orders to not discuss my daughter, her dating situation or anything about her until further notice. I think this post scared her. She has no idea what a Pride and Prejudice mother I have become. |
Oh, wow, I didn’t even get that it was about her. Boy, I made Sarah famous with my “Princess Buttgold” stories. |
I wondered the same thing. The lace sleeves were beautiful, but I wondered where the garment sleeves were. Had never thought of a sleeve lining. That is clever. My grandmother drilled into my head to wear the garment properly and I drill it into my kids’ heads. |
Thank you, Kris for validating me. I was so nervous when I posted this because I expected to be told in a million ways that I am a wacko. My only point was: Inquiring minds want to know and maybe I do now. |
I am old enough to remember having to give up my beloved, beautiful sleeveless dresses, popular in the fifties. Lenore Romney, Mitt’s mother and a stake president’s wife, appeared in a picture in the Ensign Magazine in a sleeveless dress in the fifties or sixties. Boy, did that discombobulate me. |
You’ll be happy to know, that as an ExMo, I actually think garments are none of my business. I don’t care. But I will say that Elizabeth Smart is the best representative of your faith that you have going. Articulate, beautiful, and having overcome horrific circumstances, she is a real life heroine. Just get rid of Glenn Beck–he is embarrassing you folks. |
I bought a People today and you have a point–it doesn’t look like she’s wearing garments. I’m sure she must be, though, knowing what little I know of her family’s dedication to the gospel. I’m going to go get some new garments–that’ll be interesting. Like I said, Bill’s look quite a bit different than in the past. I really like the stretchy bottoms. Do you remember one-piece garments? They were uncomfortable. |
I’m not embarrassed by Glen Beck. I never think of Glen Beck. I bet you oh, $10, that 99.9 % of active Mormon women who see that picture thought the same thing. m going to report back on garments after I get some new ones. I pretty much wear my garments into the ground. My daughter, who wears garments, wears a lot of tops that I’ve found questionable, but I’ve never said anything because I’m scared of her now. The garments had to have changed. |
I saw the magazine cover in the store before I read this, and I’m relieved to say that I didn’t notice her lacy sleeves. My first thought was “finally something in that rag I’d like to read” and second, “that smart Smart girl knows how to manage the press jackals.” I had to google the cover to check, and yup, she’s done something creative. Good for her. The last thing I want is to lay any more burden of judgement on her or her family after what they’ve endured. My first impression stands: I think she looks lovely. The g-tops you want to check out are the stretch-fabric Carinessas; they used to have only bottoms available. The tops are sized to fit according to your bra size–the number, not the cup. I got a couple to test the other day, and they fit like a snug tee with a hint of sleeve just barely covering your shoulder. No construction over the bust anymore. A step in the right direction. Who’s Glen Beck? |
I am a convert and waited a long time to go through the temple to wear those garments. Even went without my hubby (he joined me a year later). I donated thousands of dollars worth of clothes just to wear my garments properly. So, yes I noticed it right away. She looked lovely, but I did notice. I have heard that some of the styles have changed, but I haven’t bought any for a while. Will have to check into it. I don’t know if that would change how I dress as I hate my upper arms flapping in the wind – lol! |
I’m ordering Carinessas online,immediately. Thanks for the tip. What would I do if it wasn’t for you fashion-forward sisters? As for Glen Beck….he makes me break out in a rash. Ugh. |
Mommie D.- That is my point. Elizabeth does look lovely. I want to know how she pulled it off so my daughter can look lovely on her (someday – NO PRESSURE, Jenn. We love you and aren’t trying to sell you off to the highest bidder. At least, not too much.) wedding day also. When I find a pretty, Mormon-friendly look I want the details. Her wedding dress puzzles me. If the lace sleeves are lined with nude fabric, is it kosher to have the appearance of no garment cap sleeve? I can hardly wait for my Carinessa tops to get here and see how they work. My upper arms are one of the only parts of me that hasn’t gone to pot yet and I want to take advantage of non-sleeves if I can. |
I’m gonna get me some of them garments. |
I don’t know why she had to go to New York for a dress. Sarah’s dresses were both prettier and temple appropriate. I’ve seen some really gorgeous dresses in the temple that were very modest and more stylish. You know, if you’re going to go on the cover of People magazine, you should expect people to look. |
Perhaps she didn’t wear them for the cover photo shoot to avoid people mocking them. The photo didn’t bother me a bit. |
Oh my goodness, somebody thinks I’m fashion forward? Wait till I tell that to my daughters. HA! I looked again at the People Mag website photos, and I think she’s just wearing her g-tops like a camisole under the bodice/sleeve lace, or a cami-lining under the bodice. Probably not a nude lining. And it looks like Carinessa fit. In some photos it appears to be riding up on her shoulder, which they can do. They’re that snug. They do have a sort of lacy elastic edge at the neckline, and a self-hem at the sleeve edge. No set-in sleeves, just wide over the shoulder. What’s kosher? You (or your daughter) get to decide that for yourself, and I get to mind my own business. All I’ve ever heard was that you wear the garment the way it is intended, which is vague enough that you get to figure out the particulars of that for yourself. |
If she had lace sleeves on her wedding dress and wanted to wear that dress in her temple ceremony, she’d just be given a liner to wear beneath the bodice/sleeves inside the temple (since lace-only sleeves aren’t temple-wedding-dress allowed). Or maybe since her wedding dress was going to be covered up while she was being sealed anyway, perhaps she just wore a regular (or nice regular) white temple dress for the inside ceremony and only wore the lace-sleeve one outdoors. Stranger things have been known to happen. |
I think Elizabeth Smart looks great, however I had the same question when I saw it. I was impressed she could wear the dress with garments. Thanks for asking the question Living in Zion! It is so hard to find stuff to wear with garments as a woman so it’s nice when people are open about how they make stuff work for them. |
Camay, bother is the wrong word. Curious is maybe better, although if you live in the mission field and have had it hammered into you, you might be a bit bothered. I thought it was curious. Again, I am going to go buy those garments. Which involves a 7 minute ride via freeway to the other side of town. I’m assuming those in the mission field have to order theirs? And, sorry for the threadjack, but I’m giving up blogging for Lent. For real. Till April 7. This is my last word on anything till then. Thanks, Jana Reiss. |
Are the Carinessas available for Men? I’d like to be able to wear nearly sleeveless garments too. Some of my Garments stick out of the sleeves of my T-shirts. Men definitely get the short end of that stick. |
@31, are you really asking for “wife beater” style garments? Sleeveless tops for men? Way too immodest. |
#32 – That is the only style of garments that would work with Elizabeth Smarts wedding dress. And I say if it is good enough for Elizabeth, it is good enough for me. |
After a close inspection of the photo, she does have a nude color sleeve underneath the lace. I’m not entirely sure how long the sleeve is, but it does cover her shoulders at least. Darn it. |
LIZ, when it comes time to go on the dress hunt with your daughter, it may be worth considering just having it made. When I got married, my Mom did a google search in the area (I was finishing up at BYU) and found two sisters with their own home business. I got a totally unique dress custom made for me according to my preferences, and it only ended up costing around $600. Unfortunately, I don’t believe they’re still doing it, as I can’t find them on a search anymore. But that may be another option to consider. |
I just got my Carissa II tops in the mail. Those saints in SLC really know how to provide customer service. The tops are definitely snug, like a athletic shirt with Lycra. The sleeves fully cover the shoulder, so they don’t explain how Elizabeth’s wedding dress works, but don’t hang down over the shoulder.It will be nice to be able to wear shirts with tiny cap sleeves. Unless of course, the nylon fabric is too hot and I break out in heat rash. Ahhhh….the conundrums of being a girl. |
My wife got the most beautiful dress. She actually found it on the Clearance rack at David’s Bridal in SLC for $50. Then she spent another $50 on alterations that included removable wrist-length sleeves for in the temple. |
I thought about garments too when I saw that photo but, being male, I thought she must have taken them off for the photo and reception. But then radaronline has a photo of the happy couple out on sunday after the wedding and they both are obviously without garments, probably went swimming something one wouldn’t normally do on a Sunday but then again time does tend to stand still on a honeymoon. By the way doesn’t the guy look about 15? or is it just a scottish thing? |
I wondered the same thing when I saw the photos. I think she either didn’t wear her garment top for the cover shot or People altered the photo? In other photos where she is seated at the reception table, her right garment sleeve is longer and clearly shoes through the lace compared to the right sleeve so maybe the left side just crept up? I don’t believe there is a nude colored lining to her lace sleeves. In the photo with her sister it clearly shows white under the lace at her shoulders. My daughter will be getting married this summer and will have this challenge of finding an appropriate modest dress too! I loved Elizabeth’s dress too! |
Yes, I agree. He reminded me of a Teacher passing the sacrament. |
I shake my head at public actions like that not because I’m judging the person (we all vary in our faithfulness, after all), but because I want the right image of me to be out there in case someone looks at a public figure to figure me out. |
Its possible that this dress was not work in the Temple, but rather worn for receptions and publicity photos. I don’t really like the idea of being overly legalistic about things — I don’t stress over what other people do too much. But at the same time, I cant think Heavenly Father smiles on us attempting to see just how close we can draw the line and wear clothing that is “sexy” even if it requires adjustments to the garments. I am not saying that is what Elizabeth Smart did. |
If you don’t want the prying and judgmental eyes of Utah, don’t put yourself on the cover of People Mag. wearing a wedding dress that wouldn’t cover garments. |
[...] Rbc, responding to another commenter, commenting on Living in Zion’s post “I am Treading Lightly Here” at Mormon Mentality: [...] |
Maybe it will be okay to show a bit of garment someday in the future? Today, it is okay to see men’s garments at the neckline. Maybe women’s garments could be tailored in a special way to make them look nice when peaking from below? |
it’s been photo shopped. if you goole other photos you can see that there’s more actually white backing behind the lace that forms a cap that would cover the typical garment top. |
Moogie – Thank You! Your answer is the only one that makes perfect sense and I would have never thought of it. Photoshopping, of course! I am so old school about technology I keep forgetting everything is photoshopped. |
Well, hell, you can’t trust anything. |