15 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
My wife didn’t breastfeed our children at all. It wasn’t the choice I wanted her to make, but it was her choice and I didn’t judge her for it, I supported her. Every mom has to decide these things for herself after careful consideration. It’s not anyone else’s business. The Time cover was meant to be provacative, and it was, but there’s no need for anyone to be offended by it. Besides, when’s the last time you saw anyone that hot breastfeeding? |
That’s not breastfeeding, that’s a small male Siamese twin hanging off her nipple. It’s pretty funny, actually. I think my life would have been better if I hadn’t tried to breastfeed. |
For what it’s worth, alot of women who consider themselves part of the attachment-parenting community are pretty riled up about the Time article too. It’s being discussed on relevant message boards. Many feel that the article was written expressly to cause a stir and make moms like them (who practice “attachment parenting”)look extreme and/or judgmental, and they don’t like being portrayed that way. Many of them also didn’t like the photo used on the cover–they were not against a photo of a nursing preschooler, they just felt that this particular photo had a negative vibe to it. I assume you’re referring to Dr. Sears when you say “this doctor”. I don’t think his parenting standards are unrealistic. And I cannot breastfeed either. It has been one of the most painful and difficult disappointments I’ve experienced in my life. I’ve run into judgmental and narrow-minded people both in and out of the attachment-parenting movement, but I haven’t experienced Dr. Sears’ writings as anything other than positive and encouraging. Dr. Sears has eight children; I highly doubt that they went without ever crying or that they were always held. No mom with more than one child can manage that. I think he’s simply promoting a different way of thinking about babies and their needs, one that I happen to agree with. That is to parent with an attitude of responsiveness to babies’ innate needs for closeness and human interaction. It’s supposed to be something to strive for, not something to beat oneself over the head with. My experience with my own three children is that as they become toddlers, then preschoolers, then school-aged children, they naturally want to be more independent, and good parenting changes to accomodate that. Not all at once, however. Wearing them in slings, responding to their needs as much as possible, trying not to let them cry, sharing a bed with them, etc. when they are little has not resulted in their being clingy and dependent as they get older. |
I thought the same thing, eljee. My initial impression was that the Time article was going to mock nursing mothers. They could have used a much more lovely picture (with a hot mom, Mcq:)) depicting a mother cuddling her toddler. While Dr. Sears probably did have children whose needs weren’t immediately met, did he make that point? The article didn’t. My experience with co-sleeping is that we could never get that kid out of our bed! They didn’t have slings in my day, but I like that idea. Native American mothers carried their babies around and the babies didn’t seem to have a problem letting go. I honestly believe that Time’s choice of “Are you mom enough?” was insensitive and is the root of the problem young mothers have with the article. And I believe there’s a middle ground between having a kid hanging off your boob during kindergarten recess and ignoring your baby. |
in the interest of full disclosure, i haven’t yet read the articles. are they available online now? when i checked yesterday, you needed a subscriber’s log-in and they haven’t hit our newsstands yet. i was turned off by the cover because they’re going for shock value. i’ve nursed my kids longer than is the norm (still nursing my almost 20-month-old), but i agree that the cover made me feel like it was going to make a mockery. and let’s be fair; the kid on the cover is three, not “hanging off your boob during kindergarten.” but in defense of “that doctor”… bill sears has been our pediatrician for six years and he’s AMAZING. he and his wife, martha (a nurse), have eight children, including one they adopted and one with down syndrome. so, yes, i’m sure they had struggles in meeting their children’s immediate needs. we’ve since moved away from where we originally lived when sears became our pediatrician and we now make a bit of a trek to see him because he’s THAT good. there needs to be a separation between him as a person and doctor and what time is doing to sell magazines. all of our children have co-slept (and in our actual bed) and we’ve never had a problem with them moving to their own beds. we feel that because they know they’re welcome in our room, it’s not a novelty or something to be used in a power struggle. ditto goes for us using slings instead of strollers, not allowing our babies to scream themselves to sleep, and so on. the whole point is to give them confidence in having their needs met so that they know they can come to you for that if they can’t figure it out themselves. our kids are all happy, healthy, independent, and confident kids. i’m not a “my special snowflakes” kind of parent, but you wouldn’t hear any complaints from their teachers, coaches, or other leaders. they’re truly good kids and, if anything, they are MORE self-assured than their peers. in our opinion, sears’ line of thinking works and works well. |
Thanks for sharing that. You sound like a good mom :) |
We haven’t had a problem with getting our kids out of our bed either, when the time was right. Usually around age 20 months or so for our family. All three of my kids have been parented the same way, and I have two good sleepers and one poor sleeper. I agree that the real problem here is Time magazine and the way they chose to handle the article. It does a disservice both to families who practice attachment panenting as well as to those who don’t. I don’t know what Dr. Sears said or didn’t say in the interview, but we can be sure that not everything he said would have been included and that the authors of the article would have arranged what was said to further their own agenda. |
I don’t know if people who haven’t struggled with breastfeeding (which is more than 50% of the population, obviously) can really comprehend how debilitating it is to WANT to do it and not to succeed. That guilt and shame shared by women who clearly feel VERY strongly that breastfeeding is not only a good choice, but the RIGHT (only?) choice is not something I would ever mess with to be provocative. It was thoughtless. FYI for people who have never tried it: breastfeeding is NOT easy. You would think that something so natural could never fail, but breastfeeding fails regularly. I hope no one EVER feels that they are not a good parent for nourishing their child with a bottle. |
my experience with breastfeeding is that it is difficult and can drive you nuts, regardless of how many times you’ve done it before. our oldest nursed 17 months and i thought i was a pro after that. cue the buzzer, ’cause i was dead wrong. each baby is different and i struggled with our second baby. i had to pump and take supplements and she was diagnosed “failure to thrive,” but we had an amazing doctor at the time and he helped me a lot. i tell anyone i talk to about breastfeeding that you need to give it two full months. five kids and it wasn’t until between weeks six and eight with each that i felt like i might not fail at it. and it took that long for the pain to go away. i am absolutely “pro-bf” and i also sometimes feel like i’m just a milking cow or “all touched out” and all of that jazz. it’s just that, in the end, it’s always been worth it for us. |
Alicia Keys spoke on Amanda Cadenet’s show yesterday about how hard it is to breastfeed and we think it’s just going to come naturally. I loved nursing my babies, but I sucked at it. I’m too neurotic and had no guidance whatsoever. It was relief to go to the bottle (I tried with all three babies). I’ve heard all that about it being better for the baby, but I’d dispute that. It’s good for the baby in ideal circumstances, but if it means the baby’s going hungry and the mom’s losing her mind, it’s better to get out that Enfamil. |
I apologize for not commenting on this sooner but I greatly appreciate all of your comments on this post. |
annegb: “I loved nursing my babies, but….” great pun! |
Chuckle….. |
I find it amusing that our culture gets worked up about breastfeeding at all. Other cultures don’t seem to struggle with the images of a woman feeding her child the way Americans do. I struggled to nurse my first child for a myriad of reasons and switched to bottles at 5 months. With my second, he latched immediately and was an ideal nurser until he was 13 months and weaned himself (he was too busy to stay in one place while eating). I’m pregnant with baby #3 and hope he, too, will be a good nurser. But, if I learned anything from my first, it’s not worth tears. Likewise, it’s not worth arguing or chastising others over. The lactation consultants I worked with always said one thing when I would call or show up at their offices in tears: “Just feed the baby. However that has to happen (bottle or breast) is fine.” Couldn’t have asked for better advice! Seriously. I’m “pro-breastfeeding” (like it matters) but, just feed your children in the manner that works for you and is the healthiest you’re able to provide. The rest just doesn’t matter. |
I’m pro common sense. As long as your kid is clean, fed, and decent I do not have an opinion. Though honestly I have been wanting to stop nursing for months now due to the fact that when I’m in public my party is more concerned with me covering up than the baby eating. Either let me feed my child my way, or shut up and look away. |