5 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
Wow. Great post. I find myself drawn to leaders who are extra human (as opposed to super human). Once, James came home cracking up because our bishop, who lived across the street, had uttered a lot of curse words while up on a ladder trying to get a bird’s nest out of his chimney. I haven’t had bishops as interesting as yours, but I did have a few whose release gave me a sigh of relief. |
“They didn’t do what many people do, which is drop all extra-curricular activities and make Church their only focus. Instead, they integrated their passions into the call.” I think a lot of it depends on the ward, though, and what the welfare needs are and how many people die, and what the capability of your counselors are. At one point in his tenure, my husband became bishop over a ward in which 80% of the people were new, and he had to get to know them all at once. My husband *did* drop all extra activities, and sacrificed a lot from his job, where he turned down all travel requests that were not absolutely required, which hurt his career a lot. We never went on a vacation that took us away more than one Sunday, which was hard on our bodies and not cost effective when it came to international trips. But we were sure that is what we should have done at that point in time. Criticizing him for making that sacrifice comes off as unfair. There is no one-size-fits-all way to do the job. I think the bigger lesson is that every ward us different and every bishop brings different skills and talents and outlook to the position. It can be done well in so many different ways. |
“Criticizing him for making that sacrifice comes off as unfair.” I didn’t get criticism of anyone from this post, just remarking on some remarkable bishops. On the other hand, I did have several bishops (all served shorter than average as bishops) whose focus on other parts of their life made it difficult to reach out to them when we needed them. One’s wife was sometimes rude when people called, making her resentment clear. I understand it must be very hard, but I didn’t notice that with the other bishops. “I think the bigger lesson is that every ward us different and every bishop brings different skills and talents and outlook to the position. It can be done well in so many different ways.” absolutely right. |
This is a great post and I love the insight you bring to this. |
Naismith – I think you are right, each wards needs sets the tone for what kind of work the bishop will do. I am glad you and your husband were able to fulfill the needs of the people you served. It is a tough job, one I personally wouldn’t ever want. Honestly, my feminist girlfriends who rail about not having the Priesthood, not being able to be the bishop, etc. I think they are crazy. My hands are full dealing with all the stuff my husband can’t do. I am so not interested in looking for more work to do. I have been lucky to be in a few wards where the welfare/sickness/funeral needs were low so the bishop could focus on other things. It seems to me the trick is to live in a ward boundary with lots of rich members. There no poverty in the members, sickness was covered privately and funerals were pre-paid. Makes life much easier than the wards we have been in that were full of low-income apartment complexes of poor elderly, single parents and disabled members. That is where bishops are pulled to the end of the rope. |