16 Comments | leave a comment | RSS 2.0 for this post | trackback |
My visiting teacher and I text fairly regularly–at my request—and I love it. She does come visit and I see her at church, but we both live rather hectic lives and this works for me. I think the “old” way of visiting teaching was a letter of the law, where the church was mandating charity. It worked and I loved it, but times have changed. Now, we can live the spirit of the law and do the best we can, which is all God requires anyway. |
I think the important part of visiting teaching is to build and maintain a relationship such that if she needs anything important, she will feel comfortable calling you. If Facebook works for her, then it “counts”. |
I count it. Writting a letter counts, so why not facebook. I much prefer it but past VT have been anal about seeing my house. Luckily the current one I’m family friends with and tell everything to anyway. |
When I was VT coordinator in my ward, I counted it. I counted any and all contact. And encourage any and all contact. |
Absolutely. It counts. I wish mine did it that way. As long as I know what’s going on in the lives of those I “visit” and they know I love them, and will help if needs be, then it’s all good. |
It counts- as others have said, the goal is to build a friendship and be mindful of their needs. Some “needs” include doing whatever works with their schedule. |
Love all the feedback! While recently serving in the RS Presidency, the President remarked that her visiting teacher would send her a quick, “We should get together…” note on FB and then count her as visited even if they never exchanged any messages past that. So when would it not count on FB? Should you tell the sister you’re assigned to that the FB contact is counting as visiting? My fear is that mediated communication will completely replace face-to-face visits and not have quite the same impact. |
There’s no way to correctly gauge how beneficial that sort of relationship is, though. It’s true that I love my visiting teacher and enjoy her. I’m more at fault, if fault is the word, for our texting conversations because I ask her to skip a visit, subbing texting. It works. But in a real emergency, I probably wouldn’t even think of her. To a large extent, our relationship is superficial. That’s okay for me, but I am concerned at those lonely discouraged souls out there. I don’t think you really know someone till you’ve sat on her bed and laughed and cried. So, yes, I believe it should count. But hopefully the friendship will evolve in a way that creates threads from woman to woman and lessens feelings of exclusion and other-ness. |
as long as you’re maintaining contact and offering help when you read the need, i say it counts. until very recently, my ward disagreed. i was assigned several inactive and part-member families. we would invite the families into our home, have game nights, do things with their kids, but we were told it did not count because i did not share the official monthly message. some of the sisters did not and would not come to church, but were comfortable enough to call us for blessings, childcare, birthday parties, and to let us know when they were pregnant (we were the first to find out!). and yet i wasn’t fulfilling my duty, despite knowing they were not receptive to anything officially churchy-churchy or that one woman’s husband became upset when church was brought up. it really chapped my hide. one sister was reassigned because my visits were not being counted. i felt somewhat vindicated when she asked the visiting presidency members why and they told her because i wasn’t properly visiting. the rsp was kind enough to relay to me that this sister felt i had gone beyond being a vt and was her friend. she doesn’t have any other friends in the church. THAT is what vt is about, in my book. jesus didn’t want us to run through a checklist; he wanted us to be good examples and show love. (our presidency did just recently relay that ANY sort of contact counts. i wouldn’t count just being fb friends, but definitely chime in when you can and build a relationship through those convenient means.) |
I have no experience visiting teaching, but if your monthly efforts here were gauged by the standards of the Elders Quorum they would probably qualify as a year’s worth. |
Visiting Teaching should be done in a way that is comfortable for the sisters you are serving (in my opinion). If the sisters you are serving prefer facebook contact over a more traditional contact I don’t see what the problem is. |
Orwell’s right. These programs are/were meant to be a means for meeting needs of members, but they’re not working. Playing the devil’s advocate, perhaps the internet is part of the problem. Life is moving at a break-neck speed and people substitute “easy” friendships that require little real sacrifice. There’s an artificial quality to a “how are you?” on facebook that belies taking an opportunity to truly serve others. That being said, I don’t think ordering people to serve each other is working anymore either. Still, it’s pretty sad when one thinks of the level of remove that’s happening. I have hope that, should a disaster occur, we’d pull together big-time, using our church organizational skills. But personal disasters might pass untended and those who are inactive and have never met their visiting teacher, let alone friend them on facebook, will not get the support they need. I have mixed emotions, I guess. It’s easy for me to pitch in and make friends and take care of people. I don’t want anybody taking care of me and I like my relationship with my visiting teacher. But I still find it sad that so many of the priorities of thirty years ago are considered old fashioned and passe. You HAVE to leave your house to truly get to know people, but who has time? It’s a catch-22. |
It totally counts. But I think it could be dangerous if we’re counting FB contacts when we could visit the sister(s) in person. If circumstances don’t allow, or the sister would prefer just written contact, then a-okay. But if we’re just avoiding the “added burden” of a visit in person (doesn’t sound you’re doing that!), then it’s just a slippery slope. Ya know? |
Sorry, folks… We were celebrating my son’s birthday yesterday with a trip to Six Flags. I was offline all day! #9 makakona – That plain sucks that your RS Presidency would discount your efforts. Even with the sisters I visit in person and more regularly, we frequently never get to the message. We have a tendency to talk about the latest GD or RS lesson or some other article from the Ensign. Sometimes it is the VT message we discuss, but only if we’re both interested. I count my Home Teacher as having visited us if he comes over to dinner with his family and we have a nice time together. A message isn’t always a necessity. #10 Orwell – Nice to hear from you! And, yes, I’m sure the Elder’s Quorum would count FB contacts in a heartbeat! :-) |
#12 annegb – I have a strong testimony of the VT and HT programs, but, in practice, they don’t always work. I see it more like other callings in the church. The callings themselves are not the problem. It’s what people do with the callings (or don’t do, in the case of VT and HT) that’s problematic. I feel there is still a strong need for the programs–maybe stronger than ever–but we struggle to fulfill our duties. In New England, VT and HT become harder because wards are so spread out. It takes me 45-50 minutes to drive to the opposite side of our ward boundaries and that’s without traffic! So VT and HT assignments are often limited by geography. This makes it much harder to spread relationships across a ward even if you have a good number of members who attend regularly. Our RS recently created neighborhood groups for socialization purposes to help develop more secular relationships among the sisters. The groups plan social activities, not religious ones. And the leaders (who rotate every few months) are strongly encouraged to invite innactive members. It’s worked well to some extent and helps strengthen the VT program. Probably wouldn’t work real well in other areas of the country/world, though. I’m thankful the most recent version of the handbook allows for a bit more adaptation in each unit based on the needs of the people there.
|
#13 tori – That’s kind of my concern… Are we becoming apathetic in our efforts if we rely solely on social media or mediated communication in general to complete our VT assignments? As a professor of Communication Studies, I know there is a strong value in un-mediated, face-to-face communication. I fear I might be missing opportunities to share the spirit with someone even if we aren’t having a religious/spiritual conversation. |