| Introducing bfwebster |
|
email unavailable
|
|
Convert since 1967; living in Parker, CO, with my sweet wife, Sandra. I also blog at http://adventures-in-mormonism.com. |
|
||
|
President Thomas S. Monson: – watching TV, many of the tragedies reported all trace back to the same root cause: anger — father’s abuse of child — gang violence — shooting of a woman by her estranged husband — coverage of wars and conflicts throughout the world — “Cease from anger and forsake wrath” – story of counseling a couple whose marriage was stressed by a tragedy in their past: heated argument while traveling together resulted in father throwing a toy and hitting his 18-month-old son, causing irreversible brain damage – anger doesn’t solve anything, but it can destroy everything — story of Heber J. Grant: “a man is a fool who takes an insult that isn’t intended” — “Can a man be angry and not sin? Let not the sun go down on your wrath.” — is it possible to feel the spirit of God when we are angry? — “There shall be no disputations among you, for he that has the spirit of contention is not of me, but is of the devil . . . this is not my doctrine, to stir up the hearts of men one against the other” Read more » |
|
||
|
After all the hype and controversy leading up to the “very special” episode of “Big Love”, there has been a resounding, nay deafening silence in the aftermath. I don’t know if the show’s ratings were significantly higher than normal, but news and media converage pretty much vanished completely within 24 hours of the show being aired. And remarkably, the world hasn’t come to an end. In fact, as far as I know, no locust have descended upon the HBO offices in the Time-Warner Building in NYC or upon the Playtone offices, wherever they happen to be. I think the take-away is not to hyperventilate or overreact. As Nibley famously wrote,
One thing I think we will have to adjust to is now that “Big Love” has broached this subject, I expect to see LDS temple robes and ceremonies appear in other shows and movies as well. The best reaction is to ignore it and move on. ..bruce.. |
|
||
|
I ran across this YouTube video over at Meridian. I can’t embed it here, but it’s worth taking a few minutes to go over and watch it. I grew up in an era where the nuclear threat was massive and real, when the long and bloody Vietnam war was going on (I nearly became part of it myself), and when the former USSR was growing in influence. In the same General Conference talk (April 1979) excerpted in the video above, Elder Bruce R. McConkie spoke of “the atomic holocausts that surely shall be.” |
|
||
|
Orson Scott Card has written two columns over at Mormon Times, the first decrying the generally wretched quality of lessons in Elders Quorum and its possible impact on the (in)activity of newly-minted 18-year-old elders, and the second making some active suggestions on how to improve said teaching. A third column (on resources for teaching) is forthcoming. (Interesting factlet: I had Card as an Elders Quorum instructor one summer while we were both undergrads at BYU. He was an excellent teacher even then, so I give what he says a lot of weight.) Card’s observations and recommendations dead-on and worth reading. My solution, however, is more direct: the Church needs to bring back (in some form) its original Teacher Development course from the 1970s. |
|
||
|
Yesterday morning, I walked two miles. This was my latest effort to restart a regime to address various health and fitness problems I have. I thought, “If I can just do this daily, it will make a real difference.” Late yesterday evening, while turning off lights and generally shutting things down for the night, I walked through our darkened living room and smashed the third and fourth toes on my right foot against the heavy metal base of our living room lamp. I don’t think I broke them outright, but they were throbbing badly as I slowly fell asleep last night. This morning, when I woke up, they were still throbbing badly. My first thought was, “Crud, I’m not going to be able to walk today.” However, I happened to change the TV channel from the morning news to TCM, where “They Were Expendable” was showing. This is a 1945 film, clearly made while World War II was still going on, about the Japanese invasion of the Philippines that commenced the same day as the attack on Pearl Harbor, leading to the US retreat from the Philippines and the surrender of some 80,000 American and Filipino troops left behind to the Japanese. “OK, then,” I thought. “Maybe walking with sore toes isn’t so tough.” I popped several ibuprofin, did a few chores around the house while waiting for them to kick in, put on my walking shoes, and went out. Yep, my toes hurt for about the first 1/2 mile, but then settled down to quiet twinges. And I did the full two mile walk. Decades ago, I heard a talk by Truman Madsen in which he quipped, “Why hide your light under a bushel when a thimble will do?” Similarly, I think we are often deflected or detered by mere speed bumps rather than insurmountable obstacles. Satan is nothing if not efficient — he wastes no more effort on us than we require him to expend. And, sadly, those requirements are often quite modest — opposition in small things. My New Year’s resolutions, then, are not wholesale changes in my life. Instead, they are to identify those speed bumps that I shy away from and instead drive right over them. There are several things that I can and should be doing that really require no great change or effort other than to actually do them. We’ll see how things go this year, but I think they’ll go a lot better than things have gone for a while. ..bruce.. |
|
||
|
My great-grandfather, George Charlow Cosgrove, was by all accounts a colorful character. He was in law enforcement in Deadwood, South Dakota, during the same time period as the HBO TV series “Deadwood“, which may give you some idea of his life’s milieu. I never met him — he died sixteen years before I was born — but I knew his daughter, my grandmother, Florence Imogene Cosgrove Webster, very well. Here’s a bit of what she had to write about him (after the jump): |
|
||
|
There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground, And frogs in the pools singing at night, Robins will wear their feathery fire, And not one will know of the war, not one Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree, And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn – Sara Teasdale [cross posted from Adventures in Mormonism] |
|
||
|
[cross-posted from my blog]
This morning , I was listening as usual to the 7 am rebroadcast of last week’s “Music and the Spoken Word” on BYU TV (I’m usually at church when the 9:30 am live broadcast comes on). The closing number was “Come, Thou Fount of Every Blessing”, always one of my favorite hymns (and one that needs to be in our LDS hymn books). By the end of the performance, I was weeping — and not (just) because of the beauty of the arrangement and the singing. This hymn, like few others, speaks to my deepest struggles and frustrations in my own personal life. |
|
||
Discuss, with extra credit for any modern-day applications (keep it civil, folks). ..bruce.. P.S. I should have noted this in the original post: the phrase “useful idiot” has a long history in geopolitics. |
|
||
|
Our high priests group lesson today was on the Atonement. Our instructor, a lawyer, asked a question that frankly had the rest of us stumped — or, at least, unwilling to purely speculate. The question: What qualified Christ to become part of the Godhead while still an unembodied spirit? (Yes, he was the firstborn among God’s spirit children, but why? Was he that much better as an pre-spirit intelligence? If so, why?) For that matter, what qualified the Holy Ghost to likewise be selected as part of the Godhead while an unembodied spirit? Thoughts? ..bruce.. |
|
||
|
A few months back, I noticed that my own LDS blog was getting hits for “Mormon Anti-Christ”, apparently from people looking for the Mormon concept of a latter-day Anti-Christ. I wrote up a post on the subject, which I then ended with this post-script:
OK, time to have some fun. Let’s hear some of your ideas for fleshing out this mythical screenplay. ..bruce.. P.S. I don’t have permission to add categories, so I’ll have to let the MM powers-that-be decide how to categorize this one. ..bfw.. |
|
||
|
It struck me this morning that what may appear at first glance to be a concession by the FLDS Church to government pressure may actually be a very clever legal ploy. First, here’s the (apparent) concession:
Note that there is no promise of an end to polygamous marriages — just that only girls of the age of legal consent will be allowed to marry, either legally (in the eyes of Texas) or ’spiritually’ (meaning 2nd and subsequent wives). By taking this step — and assuming it’s enforced — the FLDS Church has removed virtually any cause of action for the state of Texas. If the girls getting ‘married’ (legally or otherwise) are of age, then Texas can’t claim sexual, physical, or emotional abuse absent some compelling evidence — and Texas has come up not only empty but looking a bit embarrassed on that issue. And since the FLDS Church (to my knowledge) doesn’t atttempt to file the ’spiritual’ marriages as legals ones with the state of Texas, then Texas can’t bring bigamy charges. There is a bit of a gap in this strategy as it stands. Texas allows marriage at age 16 (with parental consent), but it does not allow sex outside of marriage between a 16-year-old and an adult. Since Texas does not recognize the ’spiritual’ marriages as legal marriages, it could still prosecute any ’spiritual’ marriage involving a 16-year-old as statutory rape. However, if the FLDS Church simply bans ’spiritual’ marriages for anyone under the age of 17, then Texas is left without a cause. What could Texas do at that point? I’m not sure they could bring up US v. Reynolds, which applied to actual marriages. I don’t know that Texas has any statutory prohibition against “unlawful cohabitation”, and if it did, I suspect it would get thrown out of court faster than you can say “Lawrence v. Texas.” At some point here, Texas’s insistence on constant monitoring of the YFZ compound will provide credible grounds for complaints that the FLDS Church being singled out religious persecution and will likely bring that monitoring to an end. In short, Texas’s heavy-handed (and overturned) reaction to what appears to have been a series of crank phone calls may result in de facto legal acceptance of polygamy, so long as no attempt is made to file the additional marriages with state authorities. Thoughts? ..bruce.. UPDATED: Here’s a news story that shows — if you read carefully — just how tough it’s going to be for Texas to pursue any criminal action for past acts. Note the passing comment that the calls from ‘Sarah’ (the allegedly abused teenager whose calls started this whole raid) continued after all the children had been removed from the ranch. ..bfw.. |
|
||
|
I woke up this morning to the local (Denver Channel 2) news reporting that a Colorado Springs woman had been arrested for “false reporting” in connection with the Texas raid on the FLDS compound in Texas. I couldn’t find information on that channel’s website, but one of the TV stations down in Colorado Spring had this story on their website:
As if this whole situation weren’t complicated and messy enough. ..bruce.. |
|
||
|
Like most Latter-day Saints in North America (and probably quite a few around the world), I have watched the events in Texas regarding the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS Church) unfold with a mixture of feelings. I believe there are some serious moral, legal, and Constitutional issues here, but I will leave that discussion in the hands of those better equipped to argue on both sides. Even with my deep-rooted commitment to religious pluralism — which predates my own conversion to the LDS Church — I find myself wincing over the various details that keep coming forth in the aftermath of the raids on the FLDS compound. I worry both for those who have been caught up in this as well as for my own church, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), since this will only serve to reinforce unfounded stereotype already prevalent about “Mormons” not just in the US but around the world What has struck me, though, is that the FLDS Church, and particularly the Yearning For Zion (YFZ) group in Texas, reflects what I suspect many ‘liberal’ or ‘disaffected’ Mormons fear the LDS Church would become were it not for their valiant efforts. I say that somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but only somewhat; many who grumble or rant about ’savage misogyny’ or ‘patriarchal abuse’ in the LDS Church likely feel that the FLDS Chuch is where we’re headed unless Church leaders pay attention to them. |
|
||
|
Please join us in welcoming our newest permablogger, bfwebster. This is his inaugural post at Mormon Mentality. — Mormon Mentality Administration
Let me start by clarifying my premises. I fully believe in the prophecies regarding the tribulations of the last days preceding the second coming of Jesus Christ, as well as Christ’s reign upon the earth during a thousand-year period (the “Millennium”), to be followed by a great war and the transformation of the earth itself. I also think that the Book of Mormon events recorded in Helaman and 3rd Nephi are an effective type and shadow of the last days (and that Mormon deliberately cast them as such). |
