| Introducing Matt B |
|
matt-bowman at mormonmentality dot org
|
|
Matt Bowman spends much of his time figuring out ways to follow the Utah Jazz while living in Washington DC. |
|
||
|
Notes from a lecture, delivered March 25, 2008.
|
|
||
|
Continuing today’s MM theme.
-Robert Kennedy, misquoting Aeschylus, impromptu, forty years ago Friday. |
|
||
|
Two days ago state welfare officials raided the compound of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in El Dorado, Texas. |
|
||
Orson Pratt, “The Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon,” in A series of pamphlets on the doctrines of the Gospel (Chattanooga, TN: The Southern States Mission, 1899) 199. To be followed by future installments of the Orson Pratt Blows My Mind series. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
At the History News Network, Ralph Luker makes a valuable point. Jeremiah Wright’s words, if read politically, are poison. They outrage Americans who are accustomed to thinking and reading first as citizens of a country with noble ideology and honorable commitments. American political language is about exhortation to higher things, reminding us of the beauty of our ideals and praising our heritage. However, if read another way, Wright’s rhetoric is not political. It is religious. It belongs not to the incendiary drama of the campaign trail, but in the genre of prophecy. It is jeremiad: that form of preaching named for the prophet of fallen Jerusalem. It cries out against moral ills, locating in them the roots of communal weakness, and calls the members of that community to repentance. |
|
||
|
By 1910, 55 out of every 100 American Protestant missionaries – a group numbering in the tens of thousands whose reach extended from the cities of the United States to Southeast Asia, Africa, and South America – were women.[1] Furthermore, the congregational associations who supported these missionaries were also dominated by women. Though it could be argued this merely reflects the historic gender gap within Christian congregations, such a boring sociological explanation was not how these missionaries explained themselves to themselves, or how their leaders lauded them. Rather, it was commonly heard that women’s spirituality was superior to that of men. They had greater skills than men in what was referred to as “Christian nurture,” more talent in creating an atmosphere that enabled the ministry of the Holy Spirit, and presented the gospel in ways more conducive to the emotional, affective conversion experience.[2] We’ve heard this before, I think, but the argument’s never so far as I’ve heard been applied to the question of mission work among the Mormons. Read more » |
|
||
|
I’ve been in the archives of New York for the past little while. The first two decades of the twentieth century was the golden age of mainline Protestantism. Upper class congregations were secure in their power to influence society, confident in the harmony between their religion, their wealth, their nationality, and, it must be said, wildly optimistic about their ability to “Christianize†and civilize the entire world – two tasks that were more or less understood to be the same thing. We look back on the comprehensive efforts of nineteenth century Mormonism with fondness, but the children of the pioneers had nothing on Brick Church, a Presbyterian congregation just south of Central Park in New York City. |
|
||
|
At about 650 different points in the Bible, somebody approaches God in prayer, a rate surely echoed in the other scripture of the Mormon Restoration. These prayers are improvisational (like Samson‘s), in song (as with Hannah’s hymn) and formal litugies (as with Moroni’s transcription of the words of the Eucharist rite). They are offered in joy (The 100th Psalm) and humility (Daniel’s cry of repentance), and anguish (the psalm of Nephi). |
|
||
|
A long time ago, I wrote a post discussing, in part, the Pew Forum’s John Green, whose presentation at the Princeton symposium compared Mormonism to other religious traditions in America using the top secret intelligence about faith in America that organization has been gathering for at least nine hundred years. You will all, I am sure, be as pumped as I to learn that (the first part) of the Pew Report is now available. |
|
||
|
At Westminster College in Salt Lake City last night, Elder Marlin Jensen of the Seventy spoke on illegal immigration. He noted that the First Presidency had directed him to comment on the issue, and, more particularly, to ask the Utah Legislature (considering right now a variety of punitive measures), to “slow down, step back and carefully study and assess the implications and human costs involved.” This because “a more thoughtful . . . not to mention humane, approach is warranted.” |
|
||
|
Reproduced, somewhat altered, from a recent email to a friend. Mormons are in a unique place when it comes to scripture. We have problems and opportunities creedal Christians do not. |
|
||
|
Two ideas, first off: Read more » |
|
||
-Gordon B. Hinckley, October 2007 |
|
||
|
The problem, of course, is in defining ‘evangelical.’ |
|
||
|
Thanks to the esteemable Dallas Robbins (see comment number 9), for the past two years or so mine has been the email of choice for folks interested in finding out whether Cain is actually Bigfoot. This has not been entirely a bad thing. Gmail’s pretty good about spam, and I’ve made a few interesting acquaintances. Their ranks, with one notable exception, are rather less wacky then you might expect. (I found the same to be true of the MUFON people, who asked me to present the paper at one of their Salt Lake City conferences.) They are also somewhat more numerous. Fortunately, the paper is now published,* and I can simply refer my new friends there (after assuring them – to their occasional disappointment, that I cannot provide them a smoking Bigfoot gun). In any case, because I enjoy blogs that reproduce primary sources, I’ve decided to reprint my correspondence with one such investigator below. I’ve removed his name and everything he wrote, so what’s here are my words, slightly edited. This hopefully will also provide interested readers with a survey of the paper. |
|
||
|
I Arguably the most important moment of the Protestant Reformation occurred October 2, 1529. Read more » |
|
||
|
||
|
Over at BCC, JNS uses the work of the political theorist W. B. Gallie to describe the debate over Mormonism’s Christianity as a struggle between Mormons and the rest of Christendom over the legitimizing title of “Christian.” This is useful because it reminds us that the conflict at its core isn’t based in misunderstanding or bigotry (despite the shallow grasp of the issues that some polemicists like Jack Chick have), but on real theological distinctions. This holds true, I believe, even for the term “a different Jesus.” Read more » |
|
||
|
I attended the Princeton conference, mostly. The following is based on memory rather than notes. Highlights: |
